0 results for 'Wilentz Goldman Spitzer'
Ineligible In-House Counsel, Multijurisdictional Practitioners and Pro Hac Vice Attorneys
Notice to the bar.Gershon v. Regency Diving Center et al.
An exculpatory release that had been executed by decedent as a condition of receiving scuba-diving instructions from defendants is unenforceable and void and does not preclude decedent's heirs from prosecuting a wrongful-death action; even if decedent had had the legal authority to bargain away his potential heirs' statutory right, society's interest in assuring that his dependents may seek economic compensation in a wrongful-death action outweighs his freedom to contract; to the extent that Libera iThe Demise of the Certificate of Insurance?
This familiar document may not be all it's purported to be.The publishers of Lance Armstrong’s autobiographical books have moved to dismiss a proposed class action asserting that they misled consumers into believing they were buying an honest narrative of the disgraced cyclist's life.
Town Prosecutors Can't Do Criminal Defense in County
Part-time municipal prosecutors who defend criminal suspects in the same county have until July 1 to decide which part of their practice they want to keep. A three-judge Appellate Division panel delayed until then its ban on lawyers wearing both hats, while prosecutors seek state Supreme Court review of the case, State v. Clark, A-5661- 96T4. It applies only to cases in which a defense lawyer's appearance was entered on or after July 1.Examining Psychological Injury In the Workplace
Some employees can recover lost wages after resigning from work due to a mental condition caused by the employer?s actions.Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach et al
A class-arbitration waiver in a consumer contract is unenforceable as being unconscionable; the public interest at stake in effectively pursing statutory rights under this State's consumer protection laws overrides the right to seek enforcement of the class-arbitration bar.Trinity Church v. Atkin Olshin Lawson-Bell et al
Plaintiff's complaint alleging construction defects was properly dismissed because it was filed beyond the statute of limitations which, by contract, ran from the date of substantial completion, and because plaintiff failed to provide evidence of inequitable conduct by defendants.Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now