0 results for 'Washington Redskins'
Red Zone v. Cadwalader
Publication Date: 2018-02-20 Practice Area: Law Firms - Large |
Legal Malpractice
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Supreme Court, Part 49 Judge: Justice O. Peter Sherwood Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 650318/2011
Ruling Sets Stage for $21 Million Cadwalader Malpractice Trial
Daily Dicta: Stick a Fork in it, This Case Is Done
Restaurants and trade groups are lawyering up to defend an antitrust suit in the Northern District of California that takes issue with policies that eliminate tipping and include gratuity in the price of the food.
Ruling Sets Stage for $21 Million Cadwalader Malpractice Trial
Trial in a long-running case against Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft could feature testimony from the owner of the Washington Redskins and M&A dealmaker Dennis Block.
Greenberg Traurig Shareholder Who Defended Russian Oligarch Dies at 59
Sanford “Sandy” Saunders, a former co-leader of Greenberg Traurig's Washington, D.C., office, died while visiting family in Florida on New Year's Eve.
The Trademark Battle of Nonprofit Dykes on Bikes
Earlier this summer in Matal v. Tam (formerly Lee v. Tam), the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) struck down the restriction on the registration of marks that “disparage” under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(a).
People in the News—Nov. 10, 2017—Williams Family Law
Williams Family Law supported the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) of Bucks County through sponsorship of the recent “March for the 22” event on Oct. 22.
Walker & Dunlop Arranges $282M to Finance Disney-Area Hotel
Eric McGlynn, Daniel Sheehan and Kevin O'Grady of Walker & Dunlop team up to get financing for a new Marriott resort hotel on Walt Disney World property.
SCOTUS Protects Offensive Trademarks Pursuant to First Amendment
The case of "The Slants" -- in June, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the provision of the Lanham Act, known as the "disparagement clause," which has governed trademark registration for the past 71 years.
Most Memorable Footnote? Here's What a Few Lawyers Told Us.
A federal agency brief that a Washington judge threw out recently might be memorable for what the court called "excessive" footnotes—48 of them, stretching hundreds of lines. We asked a few veteran U.S. Supreme Court and appellate lawyers to share the footnotes that, for them, have stood the test of time.
Trademarks and the First Amendment Considered by Supreme Court
When I studied constitutional law in law school, one subject was certainly never mentioned in that class: trademarks. After last month's U.S. Supreme Court decision in Matal v. Tam (582 U.S. ____ (2017)), that may change.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Andy Goldberg, Laner Muchin Managing Partner 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Priori CEO and Co-Founder Basha Rubin; Shook, Hardy & Bacon Partner Patrick Oot 1 minute read