Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'United Technologies'

You can use to get even better search results
Upson v. Wallace
Publication Date: 2010-09-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: D.C. Ct. App.
Judge: King, Senior Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Nos. 07-FM-572, 08-FM-435, 08-FM-436, 08-FM-1278, 08-FM-1279, 09-FM-1151, 09-FM-1620, 08-FM-450 & 08-FM-555

Argued January 26, 2010Before KRAMER and FISHER, Associate Judges, and KING, Senior Judge.These nine consolidated appeals and cross-appeal stem from protracted and contentious litigation surroun

November 17, 2012 |

The Score: Will Marlins Trade Jump-Start SEC Probe?

Less than a year after moving into a new stadium mostly financed by $405 million in government bonds, a salary dump by Major League Baseball's Miami Marlins is reviving questions about why taxpayers wound up paying most of the tab for the splashy ballpark. Elsewhere in our regular look at sports and the law, Skadden lands a pair of big deals, an antitrust suit is scuttled, and new evidence emerges in the National Football League's traumatic brain injury litigation.
13 minute read
Matthews v. NYC, 12 Civ. 1354
Publication Date: 2013-07-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 12 Civ. 1354 (PAE)

Cite as: Matthews v. NYC, 12 Civ. 1354 (PAE), NYLJ 1202613190642, at *1 (SDNY, Decided July 29, 2013) 12 Civ. 1354 (PAE) District Judge Paul A. En

Baer v. Klagholz
Publication Date: 2001-04-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
Judge: Fall, J.A.D.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-7451-97T1,, A-

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONArgued: December 12, 2000On appeal from the promulgation of administrative regulations by the State Board of Education and the C

Elk Hills Power, LLC v. Board of Equalization
Publication Date: 2013-08-12
Practice Area: tax
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Law Offices of Peter Michaels, Peter W. Michaels; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Julian W. Poon, Blaine H. Evanson; Mooney, Wright & Moore and Paul J. Mooney for Plaintiff and Appellant. Richard N. Wiley for Wirelessco, L.P., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Reed Smith, Mardiros H. Dakessian, Margaret M. Grignon, Mike Shaikh and John R. Messenger for Institute for Professionals in Taxation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Paul D. Gifford, Assistant Attorney General, Felix E. Leatherwood, Dean Freeman, Leslie Branman Smith, Brian Wesley and Tim Nader, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent Board of Equalization. Theresa A. Goldner, County Counsel, and Jerri S. Bradley, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent County of Kern.
Case number: No. S194121

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8803 ELK HILLS POWER, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF EQUA

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Emerging Technologies and the Law: Forms and Analysis Authors: Richard Raysman, Peter Brown, Jeffrey D. Neuburger, William E. Bandon III View this Book

View more book results for the query "United Technologies"

April 21, 2003 |

Topical index to state case digests

135 minute read
Burrill v. Nair
Publication Date: 2013-06-21
Practice Area: personal injury
Industry:
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Freidberg & Parker, Edward Freidberg, Port J. Parker and Suzanne M. Alves for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Law Office of Stephanie J. Finelli and Stephanie J. Finelli for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. C068998

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6407 JANELLE BURRILL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAYRAJ NAIR, De

April 25, 2008 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
33 minute read
March 12, 2001 |

Defense Verdicts of the Year

Some of the biggest victories in civil cases go to the defendants, but few of them make headlines. The lawyering involved in thwarting efforts to recover substantial judgments is often equal to the level of ability, exertion and creativity shown by the plaintiffs' attorneys who win the big ones. "It's a whole lot easier to throw a skunk in a room than to clean up the mess," says one lawyer.
15 minute read
Amerigraphics Inc. v. Mercury Casualty Company
Publication Date: 2010-03-25
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, Andrea M. Gauthier; Hager & Dowling, Thomas J. Dowling and Holly C. Blackwell for Defendant and Appellant.
For defendant: Osborne and Associates, William J. Osborne; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Case number: B208654

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3633AMERIGRAPHICS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v.MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defend

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now