0 results for 'US Department of Justice'
Judicial Ethics Opinion 23-103
(1) A town justice may not grant permission to the town court clerks to use the town court's courtroom to film for-profit training videos. (2) Whether some other person or entity may grant such permission raises legal and administrative questions we cannot answer.
GCs Ponder Widening Scope and Direction of Antitrust Enforcement
A Tuesday panel that included a member of the DOJ's Procurement Collusion Strike Force outlined some overlooked current and emerging antitrust traps being set by ambitious regulators.
GOP Senators Accuse 6th Circuit Nominee of Prosecutorial Misconduct
Sen. Mike Lee of Utah and his GOP colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee raised a case Kevin Gafford Ritz handled in which a public defender accused the then-assistant U.S. attorney of making misrepresentations to a defense attorney to elicit a guilty plea.
Justices Avoid the Big Question in Texas Takings Case
"It would be imprudent to decide that question without satisfying ourselves of the premise that there is no cause of action," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice 2024: A Practical Guide
Authors: KENNETH DEL VECCHIO
View this Book
View more book results for the query "US Department of Justice"
Judicial Ethics Opinion 23-102
Where a not-for-profit entity engages in some activities clearly permissible for judges as well as some potentially controversial lobbying, advocacy and litigation activities, a judge may not participate in a voter registration drive organized by that entity.
New Jersey Supreme Court Vacates $24.3M Jury Award to Neurosurgeons Over Incorrect Jury Charge
"The trial judge failed to instruct the jury that the only underlying contract to which the implied covenant could attach to had to be one beyond the rights afforded by Valley's medical staff bylaws," Justice Douglas M. Fasciale said. "Adding to the significant uncertainty created by the jury charge and verdict sheet are the improper admission into evidence of the privileged emails and the improper remarks by plaintiffs' attorney."
Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Obstruction Charge for Jan. 6 Defendants
"There have been many violent protests that have interfered with proceedings," Justice Clarence Thomas said. "Has the government applied this provision to other protests in the past and has this been the government's position throughout the lifespan of the statute?"
Divided Supreme Court Rules for Veteran Seeking Enhanced GI Bill Benefits
"The bottom line is this: Veterans who separately accrue benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills are entitled to both benefits," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the majority.