Two airline passengers, who were racially targeted by airline staff and had to switch planes, successfully proved on appeal that the trial court erred in finding no genuine issues of material fact to justify summary judgment.

Appellant, Adam Malik, is an immigration attorney who frequently travels internationally during the course of business.

Defendant-relators, non-citizens who had been arrested and removed from the country under Operation Lone Star, moved for a continuance of their pre-trial hearings until they are legally able to enter the country.

Defendant moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's religious discrimination and retaliation action over accommodation for his beard and court found plaintiff was granted an accommodation and failed to show a prima facie case of religious discrimination. Motion granted.

Equitable Tolling's Denial Vacated in Alien's Suit Over Sexual Assault by Former ICE Agent