Search Results

0 results for 'Thornton Law Firm LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
United States of America v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP)
Publication Date: 2011-04-11
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Robert P. Patterson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Charles P. Greenman, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY. Eric L. Unis, Troutman Sanders LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Philip Roy Michael, Michael Law Group, New York NY.
For defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Richard D. Raskin, Sidley Austin, LLP (Chicago), Chicago, IL. Scott David Stein, Sidley Austin, LLP (Chicago), Chicago, IL. Kevin Michael McGinty, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, PC, Boston, MA.
Case number: 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP)

Cite as: United States of America v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP), NYLJ 1202489464719, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 24, 2011)District Judge

September 24, 2007 |

5th Circuit's 'Oscar' Ruling

Courts have struggled with the showing required for the presumption of reliance in fraud-on-the-market cases since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1988 Basic Inc. v. Levinson decision. But the presumption of reliance lacks broad theoretical grounding and clear judicial guidance. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent excursion into these murky waters is its most aggressive attempt yet to set the matter right.
8 minute read
February 14, 2007 |

Lusk, plaintiff-appellant v. Village of Cold Spring, defendant-appellee

Extended Review Procedure for Sign Ordinance Acts as Prior Restraint, �Freezes� Speech
42 minute read
July 18, 2003 |

Issue of In Pari Delicto Defense Arises Again

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a precedential opinion written by then-Chief Judge Edward R. Becker and issued on June 26, has revisited the issue of the in pari delicto defense often used by defendants in actions prosecuted in bankruptcy cases.
10 minute read
In re Merrill Lynch Auction, 09 MD 2030 (LAP)
Publication Date: 2011-04-05
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Loretta A. Preska
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09 MD 2030 (LAP)

Cite as: In re Merrill Lynch Auction, 09 MD 2030 (LAP), NYLJ 1202489005791, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 29, 2011)District Judge Loretta A. Preskap class="de

April 13, 2004 |

Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District

Stereotyping About Mothers' Qualities and Ability to Balance Work, Home Is Gender Discrimination
47 minute read
February 27, 2006 |

Second Circuit Review

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, members of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, review the notable decision in Heerwagen v. Clear Channel Communications, in which the court held that a district court, in determining whether to certify a class action, may consider the merits of the case. In reaching this conclusion, the Second Circuit decisively retreated from its position in a prior precedent that most commentators had believed placed the court at odds with many of its sister circuits.
11 minute read
August 01, 2005 |

PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION

34 minute read
September 21, 2012 |

License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

Notice to the bar.
31 minute read
December 18, 2008 |

John Doe Inc., plaintiffs-appellees v. Mukasey, defendants-appellants

Free With Registration: Statutes Governing National Security Letters To Phone, Internet Companies Ruled Upon
59 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now