0 results for 'Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier'
Court of Appeals Decision on Sufficiency and Admissibility of Evidence
Medical Malpractice columnists Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier examine the Court of Appeals' recent decision in 'Mazella v. Beals', in which the court addressed issues pertinent to medical malpractice litigation, including the legal sufficiency of evidence of causation and the admissibility of a consent order stemming from charges relating to professional misconduct.Late Notices of Claim on Behalf of Infants
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier examine two Court of Appeals decisions affirming the denial of motions for late notices of claim on behalf of infants allegedly injured as a result of malpractice around the time of their birth.Second Circuit Decision on Damages With Broad Ramifications
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier write: The Second Circuit recently issued a particularly noteworthy opinion addressing damages in an action involving malpractice at a VA medical center. That decision has important ramifications for cases stemming from care rendered at VA facilities, but also has portentous implications for damages-related issues in other federal and state malpractice actions.New York State Medical Indemnity Fund Experience
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier examine the impact of the New York State Medical Indemnity Fund, established five years ago, and make suggestions for improving its effectiveness and its ability to serve the injured children for whom it was established.An Invite to Robust Debate on Impact of 'Davis'
Having argued 'Davis v. S. Nassau Communities Hosp.' before the Court of Appeals as counsel for defendant-respondent South Nassau Communities Hospital, I would like to respectfully respond to recent columns on that decision.View more book results for the query "Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier"
Recent Court of Appeals Decision on Duty to Non-Patients
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier write that in a 1988 decision holding medical professionals not liable for a car accident involving a patient, the Court of Appeals expressly left open the possibility that it might recognize a duty of care in a circumstance where the health-care provider administered or prescribed medication that affirmatively created an impaired driving condition and failed to warn the patient.Further Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier, discuss the "judicial drift" that led to a rule that a moving defendant could establish entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence only that there was no departure from accepted practice, ignoring causation, and that in order to defeat the motion, the plaintiff would have to prove both departures and causation—a rule that has not yet been universally overturned.Further Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier, discuss the "judicial drift" that led to a rule that a moving defendant could establish entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence only that there was no departure from accepted practice, ignoring causation, and that in order to defeat the motion, the plaintiff would have to prove both departures and causation—a rule that has not yet been universally overturned.Physician Liability From Collaborative Arrangements
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier write: As the practice of medicine and the provision of health care continue to evolve, it has become increasingly common that diagnosis, care and treatment are provided by other health-care professionals, such as nurse practitioners and midwives, who are required to collaborate with physicians. But that collaboration can lead to liability for physicians who fail to provide proper supervision or oversight.Physician Liability From Collaborative Arrangements
In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier write: As the practice of medicine and the provision of health care continue to evolve, it has become increasingly common that diagnosis, care and treatment are provided by other health-care professionals, such as nurse practitioners and midwives, who are required to collaborate with physicians. But that collaboration can lead to liability for physicians who fail to provide proper supervision or oversight.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now