Commission erred in rejecting certain fees authorized by township on the ground they were preempted by the Public Utility Code in action by telecommunications public utility challenging township's permitting fees for access to public rights-of-way and court found the fees had neither a regulatory purpose nor effect, were not preempted by the code and pursuant to the Business Corporation Law and the Second Class Township Code, township could impose reasonable permitting fees. Reversed.

Attorney's conflict of interest from prior representation of defendant imputed to entire firm where the firm had failed to implement a formal, written conflict screening protocol prior to the attorney's arrival to the firm, allowing the attorney to perform substantial work in a case against defendant. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.