Search Results

0 results for 'The PPL Corporation'

You can use to get even better search results
November 01, 2010 |

Is Nuclear Power Ready to Glow?

New reactors, more federal aid have industry humming.
3 minute read
July 01, 2011 |

Big Deals

The law firms that handled the biggest recent deals in Germany, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, and the Nordic countries.
6 minute read
Johnson v. Chase Manhattan Bank
Publication Date: 2004-03-11
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Supreme Court IA Part 49 Justice Cahn Plaintiff Eric Johnson brings this putative class action on behalf of himself and all other holders of credit cards issued by def

CanWest Global Communications Corp. v, Mirkaei Tikshoret Limited
Publication Date: 2005-03-14
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Edmead CanWest Global Communications Corp. ("CanWest") petitions the Court, by Order to Show Cause ("Motion Sequence 001"), for

October 15, 2013 |

Yorty v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., PICS Case No. 13-2826 (Pa. Super. Oct. 2, 2013) Ford Elliot, P.J.E. (24 pages).

Negligence & Gross Negligence • FERC Tariff • Immunity from Suit • Federal Preemption • Federally-Created Regional Transmission Organization • Duty of Care
3 minute read
June 30, 2003 |

Covington & Burling

2 minute read
Charles Simon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Keyspan Corporation, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., Defendants-Appellees, 11-2265-cv
Publication Date: 2012-09-25
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Walker, Lynch, and Droney, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Karin E. Fisch, Judith L. Spanier, Natalie S. Marcus, Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Daniel J. Sponseller, Law Office of Daniel J. Sponseller, Sewickley, PA.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee KeySpan Corporation: John H. Lyons, Tara S. Emory, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant-Appellee Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc: Anthony R. Van Vuren, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Washington, DC, Jeffrey Q. Smith, Laila Abou-Rahme, Bingham McCutchen LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Jon R. Roellke, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Washington, DC. For amicus curiae American Antitrust Institute: Benjamin D. Brown, Cohen Milstein, New York, NY; Richard M. Brunell, American Antitrust Institute, Washington, DC; Christopher L. Sagers, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, J. Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein, New York, NY.
Case number: 11-2265-cv

Cite as: Simon v. Keyspan Corp., 11-2265-cv, NYLJ 1202572566454, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 20, 2012)Before: Walker, Lynch, and Droney, C.JJ.p

Capital One Financial Corporation, and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Publication Date: 2011-10-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 4th Cir.
Judge: Wilkinson, Circuit Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10-1788

PUBLISHEDArgued: September 20, 2011Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Wilkinson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer and Ju

Charles Simon, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Keyspan Corporation, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc
Publication Date: 2012-10-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: UNKNOWN: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011
Judge: John M. Walker, Jr., Circuit Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 11-2265-cv

11-2265-cvSimon v. Keyspan CorporationArgued: February 28, 2012Before : WALKER, LYNCH, and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.25 Plaintiff-appellant Charles Simon appeals from an order of 26 the

October 10, 2013 |

Federal Regulation Pre-empts Case Over Electric Shock

A regional transmission organization, or RTO, that coordinates the flow of electricity for energy providers could not be held responsible for a power line worker's injuries caused by electric shock because federal regulation limited its exposure to liability and pre-empted state common law on the matter, the state Superior Court has ruled.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources