0 results for 'Sullivan Papain Block McGrath'
But What About But-For Causation? Challenging Legal Malpractice Claims for Lack of Proximate Cause
In recent decisions, New York courts have shown a consistent willingness to dismiss malpractice claims where a plaintiff impermissibly speculates about the causal link between a lawyer's alleged negligence and the plaintiff's damages.Examining the Fault Lines, Once More
Appellate cases resolved with a 3 to 2 vote are decisions where people can reasonably differ. Such rulings thus display the fault lines of the law. In this column, Brian J. Shoot takes a look at some recent 3 to 2 rulings.View more book results for the query "Sullivan Papain Block McGrath"
The Plain Meaning of Labor Law §241(6) … Or Its Opposite
In this edition of his Construction Accident Litigation column, Brian J. Shoot discusses in detail the Court of Appeals' recent 4-3 ruling in 'Toussaint v. Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey', which is important in itself and for what it may portend in other actions involving application of Labor Law §241(6).Split New York Court of Appeals Reverses Judgment for Plumbing Subcontractor Injured in Fall
New York's highest court, in a 4-3 split decision, took a narrow view of Section 240 of the Labor Law, which governs elevation risks, reversing a ruling from an appellate panel. The case turned on whether a fall was caused by elevation or by an electric shock.The Scope of Labor Law §§200, 240 and 241(6): Two Anomalies
In this edition of his Construction Accident Litigation column, Brian J. Shoot addresses two unrelated issues that have produced anomalous rulings concerning the scope of Labor Law §§200, 240 and 241(6). One issue is whether a defendant contractor's affirmative creation of a hazardous condition can give rise to liability under Labor Law §200 even where the defendant did not have any supervisory authority over the activities of the site worker who sustained the resultant injury. The second issue concerns an activity that plainly constitutes "construction" within the scope of Labor Law §241(6) and yet has lately been deemed not to be "construction" for the purposes of Labor Law §240.The Fault Lines of the Law (Again)
In this edition of his Construction Accident Litigation column, Brian J. Shoot considers two issues that recently generated illuminating Appellate Division dissents. One issue concerns construction and application of one of the most often cited Rule 23 subdivisions. The other issue concerns application of the workers' compensation bar.Novel or Noteworthy Decisions From the Appellate Division
In this edition of his Construction Accident Litigation column, Brian J. Shoot discusses several Appellate Division rulings which, for one reason or another, are novel or noteworthy (or both). Two of the rulings have implications beyond the confines of construction accident litigation.Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now