Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Sony Pictures'

You can use to get even better search results
September 26, 2017 | Legaltech News

Deloitte Hack Reveals Email Vulnerabilities and Regulatory Gaps

The hack represents a breach of Deloitte's 'crown jewels,' experts say, and large financial organizations and multinational corporations are likely among those affected.
5 minute read
Palmer/Kane LLC v. Gareth Stevens Publishing, 1:15-cv-7404
Publication Date: 2017-09-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Gregory Woods
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:15-cv-7404

Factual Dispute Over Plaintiff's Standing and License Preclude Summary Ju

September 13, 2017 | The Recorder

DRK Photo v. Mcgraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC

9th Cir.; 15-15106 The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that the transferee of a nonexclusive license in photographs did not have…
4 minute read
DRK Photo v. Mcgraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC
Publication Date: 2017-09-13
Practice Area:
Industry: Education | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Paul G. Rosenblatt, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Marsha S. Berzon, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Maurice Harmon (argued), Christopher Seidman, and Gregory Albright, Harmon & Seidman LLC, New Hope, Pennsylvania, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Christopher P. Beall (argued) and Thomas B. Kelley, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 15-15106

Transferee of nonexclusive license in photographs lacked standing to sue for copyright infringement (Hawkins, J.)

September 13, 2017 | Inside Counsel

Real Costs of a Global Data Breach

Did you know that the true cost of a global data breach is predicted at $53 billion?In fact, 99 percent of computers are at risk of being hacked,…
4 minute read
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 16-cv-3081
Publication Date: 2017-08-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Katherine Forrest
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 16-cv-3081

Video Commenting on, Criticizing YouTube Video Was 'Fair Use,' Not Infringing Cop

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-08-28
Practice Area:
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos T. Bea and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Leslie E. Kobayashi,*District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli Jr. (argued),Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, D.C.; Glenn D. Pomerantz, Kelly M. Klaus, Rosa Leda Ehler, and Allyson R. Bennettt, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees.
For defendant: Peter K. Stris (argued), Elizabeth Rogers Brannen, Dana Berkowitz, and Victor O'Connell, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, California; Brendan S. Maher, Daniel L. Geyser, and Douglas D. Geyser, Stris & Maher LLP, Dallas, Texas; Ryan Geoffrey Baker, Jaime Wayne Marquart, and Scott M. Malzahn, Baker Marquart LLP, Los Angeles, California; David W. Quinto, VidAngel Inc., Beverly Hills, California; Shaun P. Martin, University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California; for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.
Case number: No. 16-56843

Family Movie Act of 2005 did not exempt from liability for copyright infringement online streaming service that offered filtered versions of movies (Hurwitz, J.)

Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2017-08-28
Practice Area:
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom | Insurance | Entertainment and Leisure
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard C. Tallman and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Stephen Joseph Murphy, III,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kirk Pasich (argued), Pamela M. Woods, and Anamay M. Carmel, Liner LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Robert M. Traylor (argued), Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 15-55777

Claim under Telephone Consumer Protection Act is implicitly invasion of privacy claim (N.R. Smith, J.)

United States v. Johnson
Publication Date: 2017-08-23
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, Presiding Before: Richard A. Paez and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Morrison C. England, Jr.,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Chad Spraker (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Michael W. Cotter, United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, Helena, Montana; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Michael Donahoe (argued), Senior Litigator; Anthony R. Gallagher, Federal Defender; Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, Montana; for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 15-30350

Restitution for wire fraud scheme not limited to acts for which defendant was convicted Callahan, J.)

Alfaro-Jimenez v. State of Texas, 04-16-00188-CR (4th COA. 08/02/2017)
Publication Date: 2017-08-16
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Judge: PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ, JUSTICE
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 04-16-00188-CR

Appellant, the suspect in a domestic disturbance, approached police after the incident "to set the record straight." Police handcuffed appellant for their safety, and an officer testified th

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources