Search Results

0 results for 'Smith Moore Leatherwood'

You can use to get even better search results
April 26, 2023 | Daily Report Online

Fox Rothschild Adds 'Niche' Charlotte-Based Boutique via Merger

Dempsey Law, with two attorneys as well as support staff, focused on family law, particularly domestic and international adoption efforts as well as work involving assisted reproductive technology and surrogacy.
4 minute read
April 26, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Fox Rothschild Adds 'Niche' North Carolina-Based Boutique via Merger

Dempsey Law, with two attorneys as well as support staff, focused on family law, particularly domestic and international adoption efforts as well as work involving assisted reproductive technology and surrogacy.
4 minute read
February 06, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Fox Rothschild Elects New Managing Partner, as Morris Becomes Chair and Silow Steps Back

Current chair Mark Silow will become chair emeritus, effective April 1, the firm said Monday.
4 minute read
Northside Hospital, Inc. v. Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. et al.
Publication Date: 2022-11-25
Practice Area: Regulation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Markle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert Rozier, Charlotte Combre, Sanford Moore, (Baker & Hostetler LLP), Atlanta, Roger Hatcher, Matthew Smith, (Smith, Gilliam, Williams & Miles, P.A.), Gainesville, Robert Highsmith, (Highsmith V. Highsmith), Baxley, Robert Highsmith, (Holland & Knight LLP), Atlanta, Dorothy Cornwell, (Smith Moore Leatherwood, LLP), Atlanta, Matthew Friedlander, (Webb Daniel Friedlander LLP), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Armando Basarrate, David Darden, Jameson Bilsborrow, (Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs LLP), Atlanta, Thomas Cole, (Welchel, Dunlap, Jarrard & Walker, LLP), Gainesville, for appellee; Christopher Carr, Margaret Eckrote, Charles Thimmesch, (Office of the Attorney General), Atlanta, Stacey Hillock, Daniel Walsh, (Department of Law, State of Georgia), Atlanta, for other party.
Case number: A22A1081

Court reverses one superior court's denial of Certificate of Need for a radiation therapy center and affirms a second court's approval of it

Cowan v. Worrell
Publication Date: 2022-01-17
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 11-20-00041-CV

Appellants owned 106 acres of land in Texas by and through various sales, deeds, and conveyances.

October 07, 2021 | Corporate Counsel

The 2021 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Champion

For this award, Corporate Counsel recognizes transformative legal leadership.
20 minute read
April 30, 2021 | Daily Report Online

Fox Rothschild Executes Third Atlanta Merger as Firm Looks to Grow Office to 50 Attorneys

Fox Rothschild chair Mark Silow said that, realistically, the firm can get to its goal of 50 Atlanta attorneys in one to three years.
3 minute read
December 28, 2020 | Daily Report Online

2020 in Review: Despite Pandemic, McDermott Launched in Atlanta and Troutman Pepper Merged

Lateral partner hires picked back up in the fall after a lull from the pandemic's onset in March, and white-collar defense practitioners were in demand throughout the year.
7 minute read
December 04, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Fox Rothschild to Merge With 21-Lawyer San Francisco Boutique

With its next acquisition, the Philadelphia-based Am Law 100 firm looks to add transactional expertise in California.
4 minute read
Optum Construction Group, LLC et al. v. City Electric Supply Company
Publication Date: 2020-10-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Mercier
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: George Kent, (Fox Rothschild LLP), Atlanta, Dorothy Cornwell, (Smith Moore Leatherwood, LLP), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Eric Van De Water, (Isenberg & Hewitt), Atlanta, for appellee. James Weston, (Trotter Jones LLP), Augusta, for other party.
Case number: A20A1010

Court reverses summary judgment order in favor of a materialman's lien because of an outstanding issue of material fact over existence of a contractual relationship

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now