Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Shipman & Goodwin'

You can use to get even better search results
E.K. v. Stamford Board of Education
Publication Date: 2009-04-09
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court
Judge: Fitzsimmons, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:07cv800

Shultz v. Superintendent of Schools, Woodstock Public Schools
Publication Date: 2008-10-07
Practice Area: Federal Government & Politics
Industry:
Court: Freedom of Information Commission
Judge: Freedom of Information Commission
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: FIC 2008-068

Radzick v. Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Publication Date: 2013-10-07
Practice Area: Appellate Law
Industry:
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Judge: Bishop, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: AC 34952

December 16, 2004 |

Dobson v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Court Must Decide if ERISA Plan Permits Insurer to Delay Benefits Beyond Due Date Without Interest
23 minute read
January 04, 2013 |

FORECAST 2013: CBA Looks Forward To Busy Year

The Connecticut Bar Association is looking ahead to the new year with a positive outlook, as we continue to work on many issues that affect the members of the bar and the citizens of the State of Connecticut.
3 minute read
Lamoureux v. Anazaohealth Corp.
Publication Date: 2009-04-02
Practice Area: General Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court
Judge: Garfinkel, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:03cv1382

November 01, 2004 |

JLM Industries Inc. v. Stolt-Nielsen SA

Contract Clause Requires Horizontal Price Fixing Claims Against Shipping Companies to Be Arbitrated
23 minute read
Shull v. Board of Education, Regional School District #6
Publication Date: 2007-09-27
Practice Area: Federal Government & Politics
Industry:
Court: Freedom of Information Commission
Judge: Freedom of Information Commission
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: FIC 2006-604

April 19, 1999 |

Study Suggests Employees Treated Unfairly Under ADA

A 1998 study by the ABA's Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law found the defense prevailed 92 percent of the time in cases brought under the Americans With Disabilities Act. The survey examined 1,200 cases through the appeals process from 1992 through March 31, 1998. It suggests that a number of "legal technicalities" prevent the consideration of ADA cases on their merits. But even when cases are decided on their merits, the study found, "the law still favors the employer."
9 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now