Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Reliant Energy, Incorporated'

You can use to get even better search results
Rinehart v. Akers, 11-4232-cv
Publication Date: 2013-07-16
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Sack, Wesley, C.JJ., Nathan, D.J.**
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Daniel W. Krasner, Gregory M. Nespole, Matthew M. Guiney, Beth A. Landes, Maja Lukic, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Thomas J. McKenna, Gainey & McKenna, New York, NY, on the brief, Mark C. Rifkin, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, Interim Co-Lead Counsel.
For defendant: For the Benefit Committee Defendants-Appellees: Janet Gochman, Hiral D. Mehta, on the brief, Jonathan K. Youngwood, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY. For all of the Director Defendants-Appellees: Other than Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Andrew J. Levander, Kathleen N. Massey, Dechert LLP, New York, NY; Thomas K. Johnson II, J. Ian Downes, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA, on the brief, Adam J. Wasserman. For Defendant-Appellee: Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Patricia M. Hynes, Todd S. Fishman, Allen & Overy LLP, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor., M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Timothy D. Hauser, Associate Solicitor for Plan Benefits Security, Elizabeth Hopkins, Counsel for Appellate and Special Litigation, on the brief, Benjamin R. Botts, Attorney, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
Case number: 11-4232-cv

Cite as: Rinehart v. Akers, 11-4232-cv, NYLJ 1202611058774, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 15, 2013) 11-4232-cv Before: Sack, Wesley, C.JJ., Nathan

In re Texas Commercial Energy
Publication Date: 2010-05-17
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: 5th Cir.
Judge: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08-40890

Published opinionBefore JONES, Chief Judge, and GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.Leo Leonard May and Texas Commercial Energy ("TCE") sued the Electric Reliability Council of Texas ("ERCOT") for

In re: Lehman Brothers Securities, 09 MD 02017 (LAK)
Publication Date: 2011-10-11
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Counsel: Daniel W. Krasner, Mark C. Rifkin, Scott J. Farrell, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP. Thomas J. McKenna, Gainey & Mckenna.
For defendant: Attorneys for the Plan Committee Defendants: Jonathan K. Youngwood, Michael J. Chepiga, Janet A. Gochman, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. Attorneys for All Director Defendants Other Than Richard S. Fuld, Jr.: Andrew J. Levander, Kathleen N. Massey, Adam J. Wasserman, Thomas K. Johnson II, J. Ian Downes, Dechert LLP. Attorneys for Defendant Richard S. Fuld, Jr.: Patricia M. Hynes, Todd S. Fishman, Allen & Overy LLP.
Case number: 09 MD 02017 (LAK)

Cite as: In re: Lehman Brothers Securities, 09 MD 02017 (LAK), NYLJ 1202518198496, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 5, 2011)District Judge Lewis A. Kapla

August 01, 2007 |

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2006-07 Decisions

During its 2006-2007 term, which concluded on June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued 67 signed opinions on cases briefed and argued before it. Listed here are the summaries of those decisions.
74 minute read
February 17, 2009 |

The Outlook for ERISA 'Stock-Drop' Litigation

Robert P. Davis, Joseph De Simone and Reginald R. Goeke, partners at Mayer Brown, write that the federal appellate courts have provided district courts with more guidance on many issues involved in stock-drop cases, including when a presumption of prudence will apply to a fiduciary's decision to permit investment in company stock, the extent of plan fiduciaries' disclosure obligations, and on the balancing of fiduciary obligations under ERISA with the obligations that exist under federal securities law. That guidance may make it easier for fiduciaries to obtain early dismissals of stock-drop claims.
12 minute read
Harris v. Amgen, Inc.
Publication Date: 2013-10-23
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen J. Fearon, Jr. and Garry T. Stevens, Jr., Squitieri & Fearon, LLP, New York, New York; Stephen M. Fishback and Daniel L. Keller, Keller, Fishback & Jackson, LLP, Tarzana, California; Francis M. Gregorek, Betsy C. Manifold, and Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, San Diego, California, Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, New York, New York; and Thomas James McKenna, Gainey & McKenna, New York, New York, for Appellants.
For defendant: Emily Seymour Costin, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Steven Oliver Kramer and Jonathan David Moss, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jonathan Rose, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C.; John Nadolenco, Mayer Brown, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Brian David Netter, Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, D.C.; and Robert P. Davis (argued), Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, New York, for Appellees.
Case number: No. 10-56014

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11630 STEVE HARRIS; DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos; DONALD HANKS; JORGE TORRES; ALBERT CAPPA, On Behalf of Themselves and All O

January 31, 2005 |

Deferred Prosecution Agreements: Standard for Corporate Probes

Steven R. Peikin, of counsel at Sullivan & Cromwell, writes that the year 2004 saw a continuation of the parade of indictments of corporate executives, as prosecutors continued to reach the top of corporate organization charts.
10 minute read
Kopp v. Klein
Publication Date: 2013-07-18
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: 5th Cir.
Judge: EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 12-10416

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Before JOLLY, G

Raymond A. Lanfear Randall W. Clark, Antonio Fierros v. Home Depot, Inc
Publication Date: 2012-05-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 11th Cir.
Judge: Carnes, Circuit Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10-13002

[PUBLISH]U.S. COURT OFAPPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUITJOHN LEY CLERK(May 8, 2012)Before TJOFLAT, CARNES, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.People build many things over the course of their liv

July 10, 2009 |

Strings Attached to 'Green' ARRA Funds Pose Risk

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides billions of federal dollars for "green" technology. Although many venture firms in Silicon Valley will undoubtedly invest in tech startups that bid on and receive these "green" funds, they can come with strings, and risks, attached.
9 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now