0 results for 'Quest Diagnostics Incorporated'
The Fork in the Road: The SEC and Preemption
C. Evan Stewart writes: Since 2003, I have been predicting a test case/showdown between lawyers who follow the dictates of the states in which they are licensed to practice law versus the conflicting dictates of the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 went into effect. And while I thought I knew how such a test case/showdown would (should) end up, a recent judicial development has shaken my certitude (but only a little, because—as we will see—the ruling is wrong).Retaliatory Discharge Suit by Former General Counsel Unsettles Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege
Mauricio A. España and Brendan Herrmann of Dechert discusses the recent 'Bio-Rad' case, in which the company's former in-house counsel became an adverse party. The eye-popping verdict in 'Bio-Rad' teaches more fundamental lessons about corporate best practices.Doe v. Quest Diagnositcs, Inc.
Claims Based on Fax Sent to Wrong Number Dismissed for Lack of Article III StandingNJ Supreme Court: Choice of Law Issues to Be Decided on Defendant-by-Defendant Basis
Litigators of complex cases involving choice-of-law questions, will do well to familiarize themselves with the case of Ginsberg v. Quest Diagnostics.Sealing of Settlement Rejected in Quest Diagnostics Qui Tam Case
An agreement detailing the division of proceeds between two claimants who brought qui tam suits against Quest Diagnostics International should not have been sealed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled.Third Circuit Rejects Sealing of Settlement in Quest Diagnostics Qui Tam Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that an agreement detailing the division of proceeds between two claimants who brought qui tam suits against Quest Diagnostics International should not have been placed under seal.Third Circuit Rejects Sealing of Settlement in Quest Diagnostics Qui Tam Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that an agreement detailing the division of proceeds between two claimants who brought qui tam suits against Quest Diagnostics International should not have been placed under seal.Third Circuit Rejects Sealing of Settlement in Quest Diagnostics Qui Tam Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that an agreement detailing the division of proceeds between two claimants who brought qui tam suits against Quest Diagnostics International should not have been placed under seal.Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now