Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Quarles & Brady'

You can use to get even better search results
February 13, 2003 |

Suing Over Suits

A law firm that has earned millions of dollars enforcing patents is being sued for allegedly filing "baseless, sham" patent infringement suits.
4 minute read
May 30, 2008 |

The A-List (51-200)

Lawyers like to lament the passing of their fabled past, when partners knew each other on sight, firms contented themselves to operating in one ZIP code and junior associates were not a menacing anonymous horde threatening to take out their frustrations via the blogosphere. As it happens, in the big-firm world those days aren't gone, they've just moved to the Am Law Second Hundred ranks, where firms are prosperous and growing steadily but retain the possibility of old-fashioned cohesion.
28 minute read
May 09, 2003 |

$60,704 Pharmacia Corporation (U.S) Mannheimer Swartling; Pfizer Inc. (U.S.) Cadwalader; Linklaters Sullivan Cromwell
2 minute read
Caudle v. Bristow Optical Company, Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-09-15
Practice Area: discrimination | employment lit./adr | wrongful termination
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Diarmuid F. O' Scannlain, Susan P. Graber, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John Gabroy
For defendant: David A. Selden
Case number: No. 98-15537, 98

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. O' SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: In this pregnancy discrimination case, we must consider various issues raised under

April 23, 2007 |

Chart: Diversity Scorecard 2007

31 minute read
April 08, 2013 |

Six Big E-Discovery Blunders

What are the e-discovery "Big Six Blunders" & and the e-discovery skills and accessible software needed to banish them into oblivion? This was the topic of the opening panel of first University of Florida Levin College of Law/EDRM two-day event, "E-Discovery for the Small and Medium Case."
6 minute read
Burger v. Union Carbide Corporation
Publication Date: 2003-04-22
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2002-04067

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 3868f Y/mp AD2d Argued - March 18, 2003 SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P.

August 11, 2010 |

Court Allows Testifying Doctors to Rely on Third-Party Records

Jeffrey S. Siegel, a partner at Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, and Mitchell S. Lustig, an associate at the firm, write that in a recent decision that is an obvious boon to the New York no-fault insurer, the Appellate Term, Second Department, expressly allowed a peer review doctor to testify based upon review of medical records prepared by third-party providers that were not in evidence, despite the hearsay objections of the plaintiff's counsel.
14 minute read
June 05, 2002 |

New Deals

In a deal valued at about .5 billion, Johannesburg-based South African Breweries plc (SAB), announced last week that it had agreed to acquire Milwaukee`s Miller Brewing Company from its sole shareholder, consumer products holding company Philip Morris Companies Inc., which maintains its headquarters in New York.
3 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources