Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Plaid'

You can use to get even better search results
July 31, 2001 |

It Ain't Over

Mike Morris is angry. Microsoft's recent unveiling of the first piece of its .NET Internet strategy gave Morris, the general counsel of Sun Microsystems, his first real whiff of the future. And he doesn't like the smell one bit. In the battle against Microsoft, Morris has emerged as one of their chief nemeses. His jihad faltered when the order calling for Microsoft's breakup was overturned on June 28. But, warns Morris, "Microsoft is a long way from being out of the woods."
15 minute read
June 07, 2004 |

State v. Knight

Here, where defendant was arrested at 3 a.m., held incommunicado and questioned persistently until he completed his murder confession at 3:20 p.m., was inadequately clothed, given minimal food, and was seriously sleep-deprived, the interrogation was inherently coercive, his motion to suppress was erroneously denied, and his murder conviction is reversed; his robbery convictions are reversed because that interrogation was tainted by the preceding murder interrogation and continuing coercive conditions.
13 minute read
September 11, 2008 |

How Solos Can Gain Financial Flexibility

Here are three basic tips for solo practitioners who want to protect their financial flexibility.
5 minute read
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.
Publication Date: 2010-07-22
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Kelly M. Klaus, Aimee Feinberg and Mark Yohalem, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California; and John B. Quinn, Susan R. Estrich, Michael T. Zeller and B. Dylan Proctor, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellee. Simon J. Frankel, Margaret D. Wilkinson and Steven D. Sassaman, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California; Steven M. Freeman and Steven C. Sheinberg, Anti-Defamation League, New York, New York; and Michelle N. Deutchman, Anti-Defamation League, Los Angeles, California, for amici Anti-Defamation League et al.
For defendant: E. Joshua Rosenkranz (argued) and Lisa T. Simpson, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York; Annette L. Hurst and Warrington S. Parker III, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; and Thomas J. Nolan and Jason D. Russell, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants.
Case number: No. 09-55673

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9316MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimantAppellee, v.MGA ENTERTAI

September 23, 2002 |

Of Golf Balls and Pantyhose

Between pantyhose cable and golf prostitutes, there`s just no way for an old geezer to keep up.
7 minute read
USA v. James Peterson
Publication Date: 2012-11-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Paul Engelmayer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 12 Cr. 409 (PAE)

Cite as: USA v. James Peterson, 12 Cr. 409 (PAE), NYLJ 1202577770898, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 28, 2012)District Judge Paul Engelmayerp class="

November 30, 2011 |

Trademarking Colors a Tricky Business, But It Can Be Done

Branding and marketing are all about money — how to drive traffic and customers to your products and services instead of your competitors'. Branding is what allows consumers to distinguish your goods from those belonging to someone else.
8 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources