Search Results

0 results for 'Pearson'

You can use to get even better search results
Corneille v. Ali
Publication Date: 2023-12-07
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk
Judge: Justice Paul M. Hensley
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Joseph G. Dell, Esq., Dell & Dean, PLLC, Garden City, NY.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendants: Victor M. Ivanoff, Esq., Edmund T. Rakowski, Esq., Martin Clearwater & Bell, LLP, East Meadow, NY.
Case number: 613960/2019

Lack of Continuous Treatment from Defendant to Plaintiff Dismisses Case

December 04, 2023 | Law.com

Ahead of the Curve: Calling Her 'a Force and a Standard,' Legal Academics Pay Tribute to Justice O'Connor

After hearing of the death of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on Friday, I reached out to the legal community for comment and quotes poured in honoring the former Supreme Court justice. I received so many responses that speak so well for themselves that I don't feel the need to comment further.
10 minute read
December 04, 2023 | Daily Report Online

Arnall Golden Gregory Takes Part in Events on Pride, Film

The Atlanta law firm participated in a series of events devoted to pride and the film industry.
2 minute read
Oasis Tooling Inc. v. Siemens Indus. Software, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics | Manufacturing | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah, Timothy Layden, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Cristina L. Martinez, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Karen Jacobs, Cameron P. Clark, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John D. Vandenberg, Kristin L. Cleveland, Mark W. Wilson, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR; Kristina R. Cary, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Boston, MA; Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C., Michael A. Pearson, Jr., Matthew J. McIntee, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC; Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Clement Naples, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Gabriel K. Bell, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC; Thomas W. Yeh, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Brett M. Sanford, Daniel S. Todd, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: 22-151-CJB

Court rejected assertion that patent claims were indefinite where intrinsic record provided enough explanation for a person of ordinary skill in the art to understand the scope of the claim and when a product would fall within that scope.

Dekalb County School District et al. v. Dekalb Agriculture Technology and Environment, Inc. et al.
Publication Date: 2023-12-01
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Education
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Pipkin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrea Jolliffe, (Hall Booth Smith), Athens, Pearson Cunningham, (Hall Booth Smith), Atlanta, Melanie Slaton, (Hall Booth Smith, P.C.), Columbus, Russell Britt, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Robert Fortson, (Gilbert, Harrell, Sumerford & Martin), Atlanta, Peter Farley, (McGuire Woods LLP), Atlanta, Heidi Siegmund, (McGuire Woods LLP), Richmond, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0787

Court affirms summary judgment in favor of charter schools and against a School District, finding that the schools' claims sounded in breach of contract and were not barred by sovereign immunity

November 30, 2023 | Law.com

NY Licensing Settlement / Georgia License Skirmish / Harris Beach's Cannabis Co-Lead / Trulieve Wrongful Death Suit

New York regulators have agreed to settle a lawsuit by veterans who challenged the Empire State's cannabis-licensing program. Will the recreational-use market finally be able to get off the ground?
11 minute read
People v. Schlesinger
Publication Date: 2023-11-30
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Criminal Court, Kings
Judge: Judge Deepa Ambekar
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: By: ADA Taylor Lupi, Eric Gonzalez, Kings County District Attorney, Brooklyn, New York.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendant: Laurice Pearson, Esq., Brooklyn Defender Services, Brooklyn, NY.
Case number: CR-032164-22KN

Court Refuses Retroactive Application of Statue, Motion to Reargue Denied

November 28, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

DSBA to Hold Digital Communications CLE

The Delaware State Bar Association is scheduled to hold a CLE sponsored by Parcels Inc., titled, "Understanding the Next Frontier of Digital Communications and Forensic Collections."
1 minute read
November 20, 2023 | Law.com

Tyson Foods Hit With Employment Class Action Over Alleged Denials of COVID-19 Vaccine Exemptions

This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
4 minute read
Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Publication Date: 2023-11-20
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Energy | Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: James M. Lennon, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE; Bradley W. Caldwell, Jason D. Cassady, John Austin Curry, Justin T. Nemunaitis, Daniel R. Pearson, Adrienne R. Dellinger, Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Kenneth L. Dorsney, Cortlan S. Hitch, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeff Dyess, Paul Sykes, Benn Wilson, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL; Jessica Zurlo, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard W. Mark, Joseph Evall, Paul J. Kremer, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; David Glandorf, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Denver, CO; Nicole A. DiSalvo, Jessica R. Kunz, Daniel S. Atlas, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; Douglas R. Nemec, Leslie A. Demers, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case number: 19-1334-CJB

Court denied summary judgment to defendants for plaintiffs' contributory infringement claim where there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether defendants' product had other substantial non-infringing uses or whether defendants manufactured the product specifically for use in a manner that infringed upon plaintiffs' patents.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now