Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Paul Hastings Janofsky'

You can use to get even better search results
January 31, 2007 |

Finley v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. et al

Plaintiff's claims that defendant's cash balance retirement plan violated ERISA by reducing benefit accrual by reason of age, because the wear-away effect violates the 133 1/3 rule, and because defendant violated ERISA's notice requirements when it converted to the cash balance plan are dismissed; its claim for breach of fiduciary duty survives.
5 minute read
September 17, 2004 |

Yahoo Deal Shows it's a Small World

When Sunnyvale-based Yahoo Inc. agreed to acquire San Diego's Musicmatch for $160 million in a cutting-edge digital music deal this week, it sounded like the quintessential California deal. But two of the three law firms involved are based in New York. Skadden, Arps guided Yahoo through the all-cash transaction announced earlier this week. And Weil, Gotshal provided intellectual property guidance to the Internet service giant.
2 minute read
Peatros v. Bank of America
Publication Date: 2000-01-10
Practice Area: discrimination | labor law
Industry:
Court: In the Supreme Court of California
Judge: Brown, George, Huffman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Nikki Tolt and William C. Quackenbush, et al
For defendant: Barbra L. Davis, Martin C. Mead, John C. Oakes, et al
Case number: No. S076454

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.Section 8 of the National Bank Act of 1864, as later incorporated as amended in section 5136 of title 62 of

Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-10-17
Practice Area: terms &amp | conditions
Industry:
Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
Judge: BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., BROWN, J., and KENNARD, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. S062201

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. This case presents questions about the law governing claims of wrongful discharge from employment, as it applies to

United States v. Jeffrey Stein, S1 05 Crim. 0888
Publication Date: 2006-06-30
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Lewis Kaplan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: S1 05 Crim. 0888

U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Marc A. Weinstein Justin S. Weddle Katherine Polk Failla Kevin M. Downing Stanley J. Okul

Reid v. Google, Inc.
Publication Date: 2010-08-05
Practice Area: appeals: federal
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. S158965

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10019BRIAN REID, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.p

November 06, 2002 |

COPY: Firm-by-Firm Survey Responses

From Allen & Overy to Winston & Strawn, the Summer Associates Survey was summers' chance to dish on their firms. And dish they did. Get the skinny on everything from quality of work assigned to approachability of associates and partners to the relative fun of karaoke nights vs. fishing, wine tasting outings, baseball games ... . (You didn't think it was all business, did you?)
123 minute read
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-08-24
Practice Area: adr | discrimination | employment lit./adr | wrongful termination
Industry:
Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
Judge: GEORGE, C. J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J. BROWN, J., and CHIN, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Glenn M. Clark et al.
For defendant: William Gaus et al.
Case number: No. S075942

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. In this case, we consider a number of issues related to the validity of a mandatory employment arbitration agreemen

November 15, 2002 |

Firm-by-Firm Survey Responses

From Allen & Overy to Winston & Strawn, the Summer Associates Survey was summers' chance to dish on their firms. And dish they did. Get the skinny on everything from quality of work assigned to approachability of associates and partners to the relative fun of karaoke nights vs. fishing, wine tasting outings, baseball games ... . (You didn't think it was all business, did you?)
142 minute read
Kirk v. The First American Title Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2010-04-08
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: The Bernheim Law Firm, Bernie Bernheim, Nazo S. Semerdjian and Wilson K. Park; The Kick Law Firm, Taras Kick, Matthew Hess and Thomas Segal for Plaintiffs and Respondents, Patrick Kirk, Jeffrey Sjobring, Wendy Kaufman, Elizabeth Wilmot and Jason Munro.
For defendant: Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad and Lisa Perrochet; Haight Brown & Bonesteel, Peter Q. Ezzell and Nancy E. Lucas for Defendants and Appellants, The First American Corporation; First American Title Insurance Company, First American Title Company and Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal.
Case number: No. B218956

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4356PATRICK KIRK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v.THE FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSUR

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources