Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Office Depot, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
May 01, 2024 | New Jersey Law Journal

What to Know About New Jersey Courts Ruling in 'Quasi-in-Rem' Jurisdiction Case for Arbitral Awards

"A judgment-debtor should reasonably expect to be haled into court to satisfy a judgment where it has assets," writes David N. Cinotti of Pashman Stein Walder Hayden.
10 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: April 29, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:April 25, 2024

Perez v. City of San Antonio
Publication Date: 2024-04-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Rights | Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Stewart
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-50746

Appellants brought suit against appellee city under the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Texas Constitution alleging that the city's development plan for Brackenridge Park prevented them from performing ceremonies essential to their religious practice.

Appellate Division, Second Department: April 19, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-19
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:April 17, 2024

Appellate Division, First Department: April 18, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-18
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:April 16, 2024

Reeves v. Associated Newspapers Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-04-17
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Lizbeth González
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellants-Respondents: John V. Golaszewski of counsel, Law Offices of John V. Golaszewski, P.C., New York, and Robert Hantman of counsel, Hantman & Associates, New York.
For defendant: For Respondents: Robert D. Balin, Amanda B. Levine and Kelli L. Sager of the Bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York.
Case number: 154855/20

SLAPP Suit Lacks Legal Basis; Media Firm, Journalist Entitled to Fees Under CRL§70(a)-1

Appellate Division, Second Department: April 12, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-12
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:April 10, 2024

Appellate Division, First Department: April 11, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-11
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:April 9, 2024

April 04, 2024 | Law.com

Florida Marijuana Measure / Another NY Licensing Suit / To License or Crack Down? / 9th Circuit's Take on Cannabusiness Marks

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner John Bash says one of the keys to persuading Florida Supreme Court justices to allow a cannabis legalization measure on the November ballot was "speaking on their terms."
11 minute read
Cruz v. Cervantez
Publication Date: 2024-04-01
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Wilson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-10483

Plaintiff, a pre-trial detainee at Lubbock County Detention Center, sued defendant, a correctional officer, under 42 U.S.C. §1983 claiming that defendant demonstrated deliberate indifference to plaintiff's constitutional rights when defendant failed to protect him from two assaults by his cellmate.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now