Trial court correctly determined that changing the goal to permanent legal custodianship was in child's best interest, where child had been hospitalized for failure to thrive, and although father had substantially complied with his service plan goals and shown he was capable of parenting child, mother did not have the same parenting capacity and father would be unable to provide the "irreducible minimum requirements" since he was also a parent to three other young children. Affirmed.

District court properly denied defendant's §2255 motion arguing 18 U.S.C. §2113(d) was not a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because federal statutory text, record, and precedent showed that §2113(d) was divisible and armed bank robbery was a crime of violence under §924(c)'s elements clause. Affirmed.