0 results for 'Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass'
Cite as: U.S. Speciality Ins. Co. v. Catalent, Inc., 16cv4414, NYLJ 1202780198451, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 24, 2017) CASENAME U.S. Speciality Insurance Co
Judgment Is Within Policy Limits But Insurer Believes Part Is Outside Coverage
Costantino P. Suriano and Daniel Markewich consider a hypothetical lawsuit that a New York liability insurer has defended where the judgment does not exceed the policy limits but the insurer has a sound basis for asserting that part of the judgment is excluded from coverage. Can the insurer obtain a stay of enforcement pending appeal without court order only by filing an undertaking pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(2) in the full amount of the judgment against the insured, including that portion as to which coverage is disputed?Crane Collapse Not Covered by Insurer, Court Concludes
The Court of Appeals Tuesday unanimously upheld a First Department ruling that said a 750-foot custom-designed crane did not meet the definition of "temporary works," and insurers did not have to cover its collapse in the squalls of Hurricane Sandy.Suits & Deals: Garbage Truck Crash Into Parked SUV Leads to $2.23M Deal in Monmouth
A Howell Township woman has received $2.23 million as compensation for injuries she received when her vehicle was struck by a garbage-collection truck.2867. EL-AD 250 WEST LLC, plf-res, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, def-ap — Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP, New York (Mark S. Katz of counsel), for ap — Weg and Myers,
Are Contractually-Agreed Prevailing Party Attorney Fees Covered Under a CGL Policy?
Costantino P. Suriano and Daniel Markewich discuss the circumstances under which contractual legal fees in a lawsuit brought by a building owner against an insured contractor might be covered under a CGL policy in New York.Christie OKs 20 New Judgeships, Senate Committee Approves 12 Nominees
Cite as: Best Value K Foods, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc., 16-CV-2263, NYLJ 1202774884336, at *1 (EDNY, Decided December 7, 2016) CASENAME Best Value K
New Cybersecurity Regulations: Impact on Representing Financial Institutions
Barry R. Temkin, of Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, provides insights on the new New York Department of Financial Services cybersecurity regulations that become effective Jan. 1, 2017, particularly for lawyers who represent insurance companies, banks, insurance agents and other financial institutions in New York. The new DFS cybersecurity regulations require covered entities, including insurance companies, mortgage brokers, insurance agents and banks, to appoint a chief information security officer and to develop a comprehensive cybersecurity program in order to prevent hacking and other data breaches. In addition, the new DFS regulations will require the filing of an annual cybersecurity report, which must explain the state of the company's compliance with the new regulations, identify any soft spots or potential areas for improvement, and be signed and certified by the company's board chair or CEO.Cite as: Great American Ins. Co. of NY. v. CNY Excavating and Concrete, LLC, 154703/2015, NYLJ 1202770540895, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided October 18, 2016) CASENA
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now