Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Morrison Mahoney'

You can use to get even better search results
September 04, 2006 |

Federal Standard Does Not Apply to Searches Incident to Arrest

This year, the Court decided numerous precedent-setting cases that are going to guide the lower courts in a variety of areas. Several search cases were decided by the Court this past term, with the Court in one refusing to adopt under the New Jersey constitution the federal standard applying to searches incident to arrest.
51 minute read
September 27, 2004 |

List of Ineligible Attorneys - NJ by County

Notice to the bar.
145 minute read
March 04, 2008 |

New Partners Supplement

View the items of the February 2008 New Partners Supplement.
46 minute read
November 30, 2009 |

Connecting Points

6 minute read
September 26, 2011 |

License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

Notice to the bar.
32 minute read
October 19, 2011 |

2011 IOLTA Ineligible List

The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring attorneys who have not complied with the mandatory IOLTA program to be administratively ineligible to practice law. The Court's Order, which takes effect October 21, 2011, and the list of ineligible attorneys are being published with this Notice.
16 minute read
Suppiah v. Kalish, 103367/05
Publication Date: 2010-09-09
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Ressler & Ressler, New York (Bruce J. Ressler of counsel), for appellant.
For defendant: Morrison Mahoney LLP, New York (Demi Sophocleous of counsel), for respondent.
Case number: 103367/05

Cite as: Suppiah v. Kalish, 103367/05, NYLJ 1202471721238, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided September 7, 2010)Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter, JJ

October 23, 2009 |

IOLTA Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
18 minute read
September 27, 2007 |

Sexual Harassment Test: Still Murky Despite 'Suders'

For many years, according to attorney Demi Sophocleous, the legal backdrop concerning constructive discharge resulting from sexual harassment has been bogged down in confusion, which the U.S. Supreme Court has not helped. She describes how the Court's establishment in 1998 of a "tangible employment action" test, meant to clarify employer liability standards, only resulted in a circuit split. And she argues that the Court's 2004 Suders decision may have only created a need for more litigation.
10 minute read
November 21, 2005 |

July 2005 Pass List

The names of candidates who passed the California Bar Examination.
112 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now