Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
July 01, 2013 |

Arbitration Scorecard 2013: Contract Disputes

Contract arbitrations active in 2011–12 in which at least $500 million was in dispute.
47 minute read
Pyott v. Louisiana Mun. Police Emp. Retirement Sys., DEFAX Case No. D65520 (Del. April 4, 2013) Berger, J. (12 pages).
Publication Date: 2013-04-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D65520

Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Faulding Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-10-27
Practice Area: patents
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: PLAGER, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: S. Leslie Misrock and Victor N. Balancia
For defendant: Steven J. Lee
Case number: No. 99-1416,-143

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BRYSON, Circuit Judge. Purdue Pharma L.P. and The Purdue Frederick Company (collectively Purdue) own U.S. Patent N

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
Publication Date: 2000-10-09
Practice Area: patents
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Marc R. Labgold, et al.
For defendant: Charles A. Laff, et al.
Case number: no. 99-1098,-109

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.Archer-Daniels-Midland Company ("ADM") appeals the judgment of the United States District Co

December 08, 1999 |

Recent Delaware Cases Spark Debate Over Future of No-Talk Provisions

Are no-talk clauses in stock-for-stock merger agreements dead? Three recent cases from the Delaware Chancery Court appear to allow a board of directors to consider other merger offers even if the board has agreed to a no-talk provision with an initial suitor. No-talk clauses forbid a target's board of directors from engaging in merger discussions with other bidders -- even those presenting bona fide unsolicited offers -- until a shareholder vote occurs on the initial bid.
6 minute read
In re Digex, Inc.
Publication Date: 2001-01-02
Practice Area: corporate &amp | securities
Industry:
Court: Del. Ch. Ct.
Judge: CHANDLER, Chancellor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Civil Action No.

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. CHANDLER, Chancellor This is my decision on plaintiffs' motion to preliminarily enjoin the proposed merger between

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources