0 results for 'Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited'
Second Circuit Bucks Trend on Arbitration Subpoenas
David Elsberg, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, reviews a recent decision in which the Second Circuit broke ranks with its sister circuits by holding that, in the absence of an independent basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over a nonparty, a district court may not enforce an arbitration subpoena served beyond the geographical limitations set forth in FedRCivPro 45.Securities Fraud Suits Against Public Companies Resurface
Plaintiffs lawyers are slapping public companies with securities class actions months or years after the date the alleged fraud came to light as they turn their attention from cases related to the financial meltdown back to traditional securities suits.Securities Fraud Suits Resurface
Plaintiffs lawyers are slapping public companies with securities class actions months or years after the alleged fraud came to light as they turn their attention away from cases related to the financial meltdown. The delayed filings are a shift from the previously common practice of pursuing a securities fraud class action days or weeks after a stock-price decline caused investor losses. Defense lawyers say the plaintiffs bar is grasping at straws amid the recent stock market volatility.View more book results for the query "Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited"
Cite as: In re Barclays Bank PLC Securities Litigation, 09 Civ. 1989 (PAC), NYLJ 1202477434203, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 5, 2011)District Judge Paul A. Crot
Considering When Courts Should Override Parents' Decisions
Robert Z. Dobrish, the senior member of Dobrish Zeif Gross, writes that recently, a court rejected an arrangement that was inconsistent with the wishes of the children despite both parents' belief that it was in the children's best interests. The case was unique in its posture in that both parties stipulated to the facts and asked the court to decide the issue. Thus, a most interesting question remains: What would have happened if the parties had resolved the issue in a manner which was antagonistic to the desires of the children, but both parents sought to withdraw their proceeding and objected to the court's making its own determination? Would/should the court then have had the ability/temerity to make non-critical child rearing decisions when the child's parents made different choices?Cite as: In Re Lehman Bros, 10-0712-cv, NYLJ 1202493939547, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 11, 2011)Before: Feinberg, Cabranes, and Raggi, C.JJ.p class="decid
Ring,* plaintiff-appellant v. AXA Financial, Inc., defendants-appellees
Rider, Policy Considered Separately to Determine If Children�s Term Rider Is �Covered Security�Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now