0 results for 'Merck'
Distinguished Leaders 2023: Amy Kline
A trusted adviser, Amy Kline continues to guide her clients through challenges big and small. In the past year she represented multiple clients in significant litigation matters.
LaTouche v. Merck & Co., Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-05-26 Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey Judge: District Judge Shipp Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 22-1619 (MAS) (LHG)
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint.
Souza v. Exotic Island Enters. Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-05-25 Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge: Circuit Judge Gerard E. Lynch Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: John V. Golaszewski, Casas Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY. For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Michael Kolb, O'Connor & Partners, PLLC, Kingston, NY. Case number: 21-2149-cv
Dismissal of Models' False Endorsement, Advertising Claims Over Posts Upheld, Explained
Paul Weiss Adds Former Wachtell Executive Compensation Partner in New York
Andrea Wahlquist Brown has decades of experience at both Wachtell and Simpson Thacher.
Merck & Co., Inc v. Ace Am. Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2023-05-22 Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance |
Pharmaceuticals
Court: Appellate Division Judge: Judge Currier Attorneys: For plaintiff: James E. Rocap, III (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice (Walsh Pizzi O'Reilly Falanga LLP, and James E. Rocap, III, attorneys; James L. Brochin, Liza M. Walsh, James E. Rocap, III, Marc D. Haefner, and Selina M. Ellis, on the joint briefs); Philip C. Silverberg (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP, attorneys; Philip C. Silverberg, Bruce Kaliner (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, Hilary M. Henkind (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP) of the New York and Massachusetts bars, admitted pro hac vice, Maegan McAdam, William D. Wilson, and Craig R. Rygiel, on the joint briefs). For defendant: Mark W. Mosier (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice (Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski PC and Mark W. Mosier, attorneys; Anna P. Engh (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mark D. Herman (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mark W. Mosier and Russell L. Hewit, on the brief). Case number: A-1879-21 & A-1882-21
Hostile/Warlike Action Insurance Exclusion Did Not Apply to Cyberattack Purportedly Facilitated by a Government
Amid Troubled Merger, Albertsons Adds Experienced M&A GC
"One of the things that excites me most about this opportunity is the vital role that Albertsons Cos. plays in the communities it serves as a grocery and pharmacy retailer committed to its customers and their well-being," Moriarty said.
Can the Collateral Order Doctrine Support a Nonprivilege-Related Appeal?
This article aims to save appellate practitioners time and money by reviewing what nonprivilege questions have recently—post-Dougherty—supported, or not, interlocutory appeals under Rule 313(b)'s collateral order test. It should be emphasized, however, that a party's failure to take an available interlocutory appeal of a collateral order does not waive later objections to that order.
Merck & Co. v. Ace Am. Ins. Co.
The New Jersey Appellate Division concluded that an insurance policy exclusion for "hostile/warlike action" did not include a cyberattack on a nonmilitary company, regardless of whether that attack was from a private actor or a government or sovereign power.Exclusion for 'Hostile/Warlike Action' Does Not Preclude Cyber Damages for Merck
Merck claimed its production facilities and critical applications went offline, disrupting multiple avenues of operations across more than 60 countries.Another Fresh Batch of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners-up include defense lawyers who secured a mid-trial ruling in Connecticut tossing out federal prosecutors' latest attempt to bring criminal antitrust charges related to alleged "no-poach" agreements.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Vaishali Rao, Hinshaw & Culbertson Partner 1 minute read
Resources
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now