Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'MGM Resorts'

You can use to get even better search results
Fears v. Wilhelmina Model Agency Inc., 02 Civ. 4911
Publication Date: 2007-07-11
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Harold Baer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 02 Civ. 4911

District Judge Harold Baer U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK For Plaintiffs: Andrew W. Hayes Matthew G. Friedman Hayes &amp

January 24, 2005 |

The Anti-Pirate

When Mark Litvack became Hollywood's leading anti-piracy legal strategist in 1998, his caseload dramatically skyrocketed. As an in-house lawyer for the Motion Picture Association of America, Litvack oversaw upwards of 12,000 cases in 70 countries. Litvack left the MPAA in June to become an IP and business litigation partner at Los Angeles' Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp. The move has him joining forces with partner Russell Frackman, whose has waged his own 35-year battle against music pirates.
9 minute read
March 29, 2005 |

Grokster Is Not Napster

Charles S. Baker argues that the software at issue in Grokster is not a file-sharing "service," nor does it maintain computers that participate in the exchange of files. Instead, it allows users to connect to one another to create an open peer-to-peer network directly between their own computers. The Supreme Court's Sony decision, says Baker, makes it perfectly clear that the mere capability of substantial noninfringing uses is all that is required to protect a new technology from attack.
4 minute read
March 29, 2005 |

Grokster Is Not Napster

Charles S. Baker argues that the software at issue in Grokster is not a file-sharing "service," nor does it maintain computers that participate in the exchange of files. Instead, it allows users to connect to one another to create an open peer-to-peer network directly between their own computers. The Supreme Court's Sony decision, says Baker, makes it perfectly clear that the mere capability of substantial noninfringing uses is all that is required to protect a new technology from attack.
4 minute read
March 29, 2005 |

Grokster Is Not Napster

Charles S. Baker argues that the software at issue in Grokster is not a file-sharing "service," nor does it maintain computers that participate in the exchange of files. Instead, it allows users to connect to one another to create an open peer-to-peer network directly between their own computers. The Supreme Court's Sony decision, says Baker, makes it perfectly clear that the mere capability of substantial noninfringing uses is all that is required to protect a new technology from attack.
4 minute read
Levine v. AtriCure, Inc., 06-cv-14324
Publication Date: 2009-02-09
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Richard Holwell
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 06-cv-14324

District Judge Richard J. Holwell U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Samuel H. Rudman David A. Rosenfeld Lerach, Coughlin, Stoia, Gel

The Weitz Company v. Mh Washington, et al
Publication Date: 2011-01-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 8th Cir.
Judge: Benton, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-3116/3649, No. 09-3118/3635

Submitted: October 21, 2010Before MURPHY, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.The Weitz Company, LLC, sued MH Washington, LLC, MacKenzie House, LLC, and Summit Steel Fabricators, Inc., for breach o

Telenor Mobile Communications AS v. Storm LLC, 07 Civ. 6929
Publication Date: 2007-11-14
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Gerard Lynch
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 07 Civ. 6929

District Judge Gerard E. Lynch U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Robert L. Sills and Jay K. Musoff, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY

In Re Coudert Brothers, 11 Civ. 4949
Publication Date: 2013-02-06
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 11 Civ. 4949

Cite as: In Re Coudert Brothers, 11 Civ. 4949, NYLJ 1202587046839, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 30, 2013)District Judge Paul A. Engelmayerp class="de

United States v. Burgess
Publication Date: 2009-09-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 10th Cir.
Judge: O'brien, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08-8053

PUBLISHBefore TACHA, O'BRIEN, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.Following a traffic stop and a canine alert, police searched David Burgess' motor home for drugs and evidence of drug trafficking. The

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now