Search Results

0 results for 'Litchfield Cavo'

You can use to get even better search results
December 20, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Commodore Plaza Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Commodore Plaza Condo. Ass'n, Inc.v.QBE Ins. Corp. 2013 WL 150612Only the Westlaw citation is currently…
14 minute read
December 18, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Dollar Phone Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Dollar Phone Corp.v.St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 514 Fed.Appx. 21This case was not selected…
3 minute read
December 17, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Westport Ins. Corp. v. VN Hotel Grp.

 Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Westport Ins. Corp.v.VN Hotel Grp., LLC 513 Fed.Appx. 927This case was not selected for publication…
12 minute read
November 11, 2013 |

Surveillance Footage in Litigation

Where a party is on notice of potential legal action, any intentional or negligent destruction of surveillance footage will normally result in spoliation sanctions. But what if a party was on notice of a potential claim before destruction of the footage, but maintains that the footage did not capture the event in question?
9 minute read
November 07, 2013 |

Surveillance Footage in Litigation

John V. Barbieri and Michael K. Dvorkin, partners at Litchfield Cavo, write that where a party is on notice of potential legal action, any intentional or negligent destruction of surveillance footage will normally result in spoliation sanctions. What if, however, a party was on notice of a potential claim before destruction of the footage, but maintains that the footage did not capture the event in question? Or only some footage was destroyed?
9 minute read
June 13, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

No Coverage for Sheriff’s Employees Who Allegedly Had Sex with Prisoner without Her Consent

A federal district court in Illinois has ruled that an insurer was not obligated to defend claims against employees of a county sheriff that they had sex…
5 minute read
March 28, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

11th Circuit Confirms Ruling that Insurer Must Defend Hotel in Legionnaires’ Disease Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has withdrawn an opinion in a Legionnaires’ Disease case against a hotel but confirmed its prior…
4 minute read
March 19, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

2d Circuit: ‘Poor Quality’ Exclusion Bars Coverage of Claim that Calling Cards Provided Fewer Minutes than Advertised

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that a “poor quality” exclusion in an insurance policy barred coverage of claims…
2 minute read
February 25, 2013 |

Issues Surrounding Insurer's Late Disclaimer: What to Do?

Louis F. Eckert, a senior partner with Litchfield Cavo, and Richard Petersen, a senior associate with the firm, write that insurers must pay close attention to not only the timing of their denials, but also the cause behind them.
30 minute read
February 05, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Company Car Not Covered Under Business Auto Policy, Court Finds

A federal district court has ruled that a Land Rover owned by Maintenance Dynamics, Inc. (“MDI”), was not a covered auto under a business auto…
5 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now