Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'IBM'

You can use to get even better search results
April 16, 2007 |

GC Helps Red Hat Change the Technology World

Red Hat Inc., the world's leading open-source and Linux software provider, offers a comprehensive line of software subscriptions, services and support. Its customers include a constellation of academic and research institutions, all levels of government and a who's-who list of corporations. GC Michael Cunningham says "it is a privilege to participate in a company like Red Hat that is doing some good around the world as well as making a profit."
5 minute read
Bayer Schera Pharma AG v. Sandoz Inc., 08 Civ. 03710
Publication Date: 2010-04-05
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Paul Gardephe
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08 Civ. 03710

District Judge Paul G. Gardephe U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff: Bayer Schering Pharma Ag represented by Adam K. Mortara, Bartlit Beck Herman

Bernard v. UBS Warburg LLC
Publication Date: 2004-10-01
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Berman On or about June 12, 2003, Barbara E. Bernard ("Bernard"), on behalf of herself and others similarly sit

IP Litigation Roundup: More Bites at Apple
Publication Date: 2012-11-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Apple had a lousy week in patent litigation. Not only did it lose a hefty infringement verdict to a small software company called VirnetX, but a rate-setting case against Motorola Mobility Inc. went off the rails on the eve of trial.

U.S. Gas Electric Inc. v. Big Apple Energy LLC, 09-CV-1961
Publication Date: 2010-04-16
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
Judge: Arthur Spatt
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-CV-1961

District Judge Arthur D. Spatt U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for the Plaintiff: By: David J. Fischer, Esq., Jennifer Dou

March 16, 2006 |

Critical Patent Issue in eBay Case

The stakes are high as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in a case that involves standards for injunctive relief.
9 minute read
Carr v. Tillery
Publication Date: 2010-01-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 7th Cir.
Judge: Posner, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Nos. 09-1124 & 09-1168

ARGUED DECEMBER 4, 2009Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.Rex Carr, a successful class action lawyer in southern Illinois, is locked in mortal combat with his former law partners, t

King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, 09 Civ. 8387 (SAS)
Publication Date: 2010-11-04
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs King County, Washington and Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation: Anne L. Box, Esq., Patrick J. Coughlin, Esq., Daniel S. Drosman, Esq., Nathan R. Lindell, Esq., Jessica T. Shinnefield, Esq., David C. Walton, Esq., Darryl J. Alvarado, Esq., X Jay Alvarez, Esq., Christina A. Royce, Esq., Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, California Samuel H. Rudman, Esq., David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Robert M. Rothman, Esq., Jarrett S. Charo, Esq., Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, New York Luke O. Brooks, Esq., Jason C. Davis, Esq., Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Francisco, California
For defendant: For Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited: Antonio Jorge Perez-Marques, Esq., Davis Polk & Wardwell L.L.P., New York, NY James P. Rouhandeh, Esq., Davis Polk & Wardwell L.L.P., New York, NY For Defendants IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG and IKB Credit Asset Management, GmbH: John D. McFerrin-Clancy, Esq., Zachary D. Rosenbaum, Lowenstein Sandler PC, New York, New York Thomas E. Redburn, Jr., Esq., Jennifer Jane McGruther, Esq., Lowenstein Sandler PC, Roseland, New Jersey For Defendants Moody's Investors Service Limited and Moody's Investors Service, Inc.: James J. Coster, Esq., Justin E. Klein, Esq., James J. Regan, Esq., Joshua M. Rubins, Esq., Aaron M. Zeisler, Esq., Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York, New York For Defendant The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. d/b/a Standard & Poor's Rating Services: Floyd Abrams, Esq., Andrea R. Butler, Esq., Jason M. Hall, Esq., Brian T Markley, Esq., Dean I. Ringel, Esq., Tammy L. Roy, Esq., Adam N. Zurofsky, Esq., Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, New York For Defendant Fitch, Inc.: Andrew J. Ehrlich, Esq., Martin Flumenbaum, Esq., Roberta A. Kaplan, Esq., Mark S. Silver, Esq., Tobias J. Stern, Esq., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York For Defendant Stefan Ortseifen: Thomas S. Wiswall, Esq., Phillips Lytle LLP, Rochester, New York For Defendant Winfried Reinke: Fran M. Jacobs, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, New York, NY
Case number: 09 Civ. 8387 (SAS)

Cite as: King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, 09 Civ. 8387 (SAS), NYLJ 1202474373592, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 29, 2010)District Judge Shira A. Sch

November 29, 2004 |

$100,000 Software Overhaul Now May Save $30M in Damages Later

When Fish & Richardson missed a patent filing deadline for client Kairos Scientific Inc., the mistake cost $30 million. That's the dollar amount a judge placed on the error when he ordered the firm to pay damages to Kairos. According to a Fish spokesperson, the firm missed the date because someone deleted the deadline from the firm's docketing system. The case highlights the importance of meeting filing deadlines, and of docketing software.
6 minute read
June 28, 1999 |

And the Winner Is....

It's in his hands now. U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson must review the transcripts of 76 days of testimony. The case went out not with a bang, but with a whimper, as the evidentiary phase of the government's landmark antitrust trial against Microsoft concluded June 24. The judge will issue findings of fact and then conclusions of law about questions ranging from whether Microsoft committed illegal tying or predatory practices to whether it constitutes a monopoly.
9 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now