Norman H. Dachs and Jonathan A. Dachs, attorneys with Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, write that the issuance by the Appellate Division of a decision that appears to contradict, and thus, call into question well-established and well-settled rules of law is a rare and unusual event. When that happens, as it appears to have in a case in which the authors appeared as appellate counsel for the plaintiffs-appellants, the decision is worthy of note, analysis and discussion.
10 minute read