Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Hunter Maclean Exley'

You can use to get even better search results
First Born Church of the Living God Inc. v. Bank of Am.
Publication Date: 2001-02-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Pope, Marion T.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kirby C. G. Mason Hunter, McLean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, John M. Hatfield The Hatfield Law Firm, Waycross, and Walter D. Adams, Brunswick, for appellant.
For defendant: . Lamar Gibson Gibson & Spivey PC, Waycross, and Monica L. Cothran Davenport, James & Cothran, Panama City, Fla., for appellee. Other party representation: Kerey Carpenter, Tallahassee, Fla.
Case number: A00A1795

The trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the church board's successive attempts to remove its senior bishop because the Court of Appeals' decision in the parties

Douglas Kohoutek Ltd. v. Hartley, Rowe & Fowler PC
Publication Date: 2001-01-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert H. Benefield Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Michael J. Gorby, Christine A. Carson, Karen E. Cooper Gorby, Reeves, Peters & Burns and Daniel E. Turner, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: A00A2064

There was no evidence that defendants attempted to conceal their alleged delay in filing a UCC financing stat

Brown v. Estate of Walter Brown Sr.
Publication Date: 2000-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert R. Cook Hendrix Law Firm PC, Richmond Hill, for appellant.
For defendant: Mills L. Morrison and Robert A. Lewallen Jr. Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellee.
Case number: A00A1213

The 76-year-old widow was not bound by her ele to take property under her husband's will because there was no evidence that she knew she was entitled to a year's support when she made the ele

Sieg v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP
Publication Date: 2000-11-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Blackburn, G. Alan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A00A1072, A00A1073

Because a prior suit determined the widow's entitlement to her husband's retirement ben no actual controversy existed between the widow and the husband's company regarding those ben

Brown v. Estate of Walter Brown Sr.
Publication Date: 2000-11-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert R. Cook Hendrix Law Firm PC, Richmond Hill, for appellant.
For defendant: Mills L. Morrison and Robert A. Lewallen Jr. Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellee.
Case number: A00A1213

The 76-year-old widow was not bound by her ele to take property under her husband's will because there was no evidence that she knew she was entitled to a year's support when she made the ele

Bays v. River Oaks
Publication Date: 2000-08-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Eugene C. Brooks IV and Russell M. Stookey, Savannah, for appellant.
For defendant: . Audrey R. Kohn, Paul A. Howell Jr. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Atlanta, Glen M. Darbyshire Inglesby, Falligant, Horne, Courington & Chisholm, Dennis B. Keene and Seslee S. Smith Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellees. Other party representation: Tracy O'Connell, Ryburn C. Ratterree Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Bart, Fred S. Clark Clark & Clark, Savannah, John L. Taylor Jr. and Jeffery T. Coleman Chorey, Taylor & Feil, Atlanta.
Case number: A00A0673

After converting defendants' motion to dismiss into a motion for summary jud the trial court failed to afford plaintiffs 30 days in which to respond to the new motion for summary jud

Anatek Inc. v. CSX Realty Dev. LLC
Publication Date: 2000-05-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: McMurray, William Leroy
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kevin R. Armbruster Cushing, Morris, Armbruster & Jones, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Christopher W. Phillips Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellee.
Case number: A00A0562

The plaintiff's contract with the defendant's lessee for improvements to the leased premises did not subject the defendant's property to an enforceable lien because there was no contractual relation

Albany Urology Clinic PC v. Cleveland
Publication Date: 2000-03-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Sears, Leah Ward
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thomas S. Chambless and Dawn G. Benson Watson, Spence, Lowe & Chambless LLP, George P. Donaldson III Donaldson, Bell & Pickett PC, Albany, and Wade H. Coleman Tillman, McTier, Coleman, Talley, Newberry & Kurrie, Valdosta, for appellant.
For defendant: . William S. Stone and T. Craig Ernest William S. Stone PC, Blakely, for appellees. Amicus appellants: Harold G. Clarke Troutman Sanders, Thomas S. Carlock Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, John E. Hall Jr., Jonathan Marigliano Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover PC, Emmet J. Bondurant, Michael B. Terry Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore LLP, Robert E. Whitley, William M. Earnest Jr. Thrasher, Whitley, Hampton & Morgan, Jack S. Schroder Jr., Angela T. Burnette Alston & Bird, David A. Cook, William T. Clark Medical Ass'n of Ga., Atlanta, David H. Tisinger, Richard G. Tisinger Jr. Tisinger, Tisinger, Vance & Greer, Carrollton, Leonard A. Nelson and E. Ratcliffe Anderson Jr. MD American Med. Ass'n, Chicago, Ill.
Case number: S99G0600

Urologist was not liable to plaintiff for fraud since he had no duty to disclose his use of illegal drugs or any other aspect of his personal life that might adversely impact his professional perfor

DeLoach v. Rovema Corp.
Publication Date: 2000-02-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Cletus W. Bergen II, Savannah, for appellant.
For defendant: . Robert S. Glenn Jr., Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellees.
Case number: A99A2431

Since defendant only sold and did not manufacture the machine that injured plaintiff, it had no duty to warn of the machine's dangers that arose or were discovered after the time of the

July 24, 2012 |

Firms can shield malpractice talk

Judge Stephen Dillard, left, wrote the Georgia Court of Appeals ruling that said a law firm can have attorney-client privilege with its GC even if the client is threatening a malpractice suit. Susan Cox, right, represented the firm, Hunter Maclean, in the decision.
8 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources