0 results for 'Holland & Hart LLP'
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management
Publication Date: 2012-10-22 Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Court: 9th Cir. Judge: Before: Marsha S. Berzon and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and William E. Smith, District Judge.* Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric. R. Glitzenstein (argued), Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife et al. Amy R. Atwood, Center for Biological Diversity, Portland, Oregon, John T. Buse, Center for Biological Diversity, San Francisco, California, Howard M. Crystal, Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Center for Biological Diversity. Adam M. Kron, Kara Gillon, Michael P. Senatore, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Defenders of Wildlife et al.
Randolph H. Barnhouse, Samuel D. Hough (argued), Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP, Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, New Mexico, for petitioner Fort Bidwell Indian Community of the Fort Bidwell Indian Reservation of California.
Colette Routel (argued), Assistant Professor, William Mitchell College of Law, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for petitioner Summit Lake Paiute Tribe.
Constance E. Brooks, Michael Marinovich (argued), C.E. Brooks & Associates, P.C., Denver, Colorado, for petitioner Coalition of Local Governments. For defendant: Nicholas A. DiMascio, Lane N. McFadden, Jennifer S. Neumann (argued), U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for respondents U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
John A. Bryson (argued), John F. Clark, Holland & Hart LLP, Washington, D.C., William G. Myers III, Holland & Hart LLP, Boise, Idaho, Aaron C. Courtney, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, Craig V. Richardson, El Paso Corporation Pipeline Group, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Thomas L. Sansonetti, Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming, Troy A. Eid, Jennifer H. Weddle, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Denver, Colorado, for respondent-intervenor Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. Case number: No. 10-72356 No. 10-72552 No. 10-72768 No. 10-72775
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11924CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAG
Klestadt & Winters, LLP v. Cangelosi
Publication Date: 2012-03-06 Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Court: 9th Cir. Judge: Robert C. Jones, Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: Susan P. Graber and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Gordon J. Quist,* Senior District Judge. Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanley J. Panikowski (argued), DLA Piper LLP, San Diego, California, for petitioners-appellants Klestadt & Winters, LLP and Tracy Klestadt.
J. Stephen Peek, Holland & Hart LLP, Las Vegas, Nevada, for petitioners-appellants Bryan Cave LLP and Katherine Windler.
J. Thomas Beckett (argued), Mark W. Dykes, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioners-appellants Silar Advisors LP, et al. For defendant: Robert M. Millimet (argued), Michael J. Collins, Bickel & Brewer, Dallas, Texas; Janet L. Chubb, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Reno, Nevada; Lisa A. Rasmussen, Las Vegas, Nevada, for respondents-appellees Donna Cangelosi and Certain Direct Lenders. Case number: No. 10-16970 No. 10-16972 No. 10-16974
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 2712 KLESTADT & WINTERS, LLP; TRACY L. KLESTADT, Petitioners-Appellants, v. DONNA
State of Alaska v. Lubchenco
Publication Date: 2013-07-23 Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Court: 9th Cir. Judge: Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding Before: Mary M. Schroeder, M. Margaret McKeown, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges. Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bradley E. Meyen and Andrew R. Naylor, Assistant Attorneys General, State of Alaska, Department of Law, Anchorage, Alaska; Murray D. Feldman, Holland & Hart LLP, Boise, Idaho; Christina F. Gomez, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant State of Alaska. For defendant: Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General, Dean Dunsmore, John H. Martin, Daniel Pollak, Joan M. Pepin, and J. David Gunter II (argued), United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees Jane Lubchenco, et al. Case number: No. 12-35201 No. 12-35203 No. 12-35204
Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7718 STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, and FREEZER LONGLINE COAL
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Acquisitions Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
Authors: Stephen M. Axinn, Blaine V. Fogg, Neal R. Stoll, Bruce J. Prager, Joseph P. Nisa
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Holland & Hart LLP"
Split verdict on women partners
Most law firms have made their partner promotions for 2009, and the results are a "mixed bag" for women, according to the Project for Attorney Retention. A study of new partner classes at 85 major law firms found that women made up about 28% of newly minted partners. The results varied greatly from firm to firm, however. Women made up 40% or more of new partners at 23 of the firms surveyed, while 14 firms did not promote any women to partner this year.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
Resources
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now