Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Harter Secrest Emery'

You can use to get even better search results
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008 City

49 minute read
August 23, 2006 |

Finnegan Leaps to Top of Associate Satisfaction Charts

For years, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner languished around 50th place in The American Lawyer's midlevel associate survey -- respectable, but unexciting. In the last few years, the firm has steadily climbed, reaching second place this year. What fueled Finnegan's leap? The oft-cited but elusive "collegiality" is a big part of it. Combine Finnegan's high marks for partner-associate and peer relationships with the halo currently surrounding IP, and you've got a winning place to work.
11 minute read
June 07, 2002 |

Panel Clarifies Toxic Tort Discovery Rule

ALBANY An appellate panel in Albany has held in an apparent case of first impression that the longer limitations period of the toxic tort discovery rule applies only where injury results from latent or insidious exposure rather than where the alleged damage has nothing to do with the elapsed time.
5 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

To find out how Midlevel associates rate their firms as workplaces, our annual midlevel survey examined 12 areas that contribute to job satisfaction. They include relations with partners and other associates, the interest and satisfaction level asso-ciates have in their work, training and guidance, policy on billables, management openness about firm strategies and partnership chances, the firm?s attitude toward pro bono work, compensation and benefits, and the respondents? inclination to stay at their firm for at least two more years. Respondents graded their firms on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. On this chart, firms with ten or more responses are ranked by their averages on those questions. Averages include responses from all participating of-fices. For definitions of national and international firms, and for other details, see our methodology
20 minute read
January 06, 2012 |

The Bankruptcy Files: A Big Start to 2012

13 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
October 15, 2009 |

Bar Exam Results

The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners announced the results of the bar examination given July 28 and 29. A total of 1,997 applicants took the examination of which 1,623 passed. (The overall pass rate was 81 percent.)
17 minute read
May 01, 2007 |

Matter of North Country Citizens for Responsible Growth Inc., petitioner v. Town of Potsdam Planning Board, respondents

Site Approval, Variance for Wal-Mart Supercenter Satisfied SEQRA, Not Arbitrary
11 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008 City

49 minute read
Oneida Nation of New York v. Cuomo, 10-4265(L)
Publication Date: 2011-05-11
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Wesley, Chin, and Lohier, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Riyaz A. Kanji (Cory J. Albright, Zach Welcker, Kanji & Katzen, PLLC; Christopher Karns, Owen Herne, Seneca Nation of Indians Department of Justice, Salamanca, NY; Carol E. Heckman, Jeffrey A. Wadsworth, David T. Archer, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Buffalo, NY, on the brief), Kanji & Katzen, PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Seneca Nation of Indians. David W. Debruin (Scott B. Wilkens, Joshua M. Segal, Jenner & Block, LLP; Daniel French, Lee Alcott, French-Alcott, PLLC, Syracuse, NY, on the brief), Jenner & Block, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor-Appellant Cayuga Indian Nation of New York. James M. Wicks (George C. Pratt, Hillary A. Frommer, Farrell Fritz, P.C.; James F. Simermeyer, New York, NY, on the brief), Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Unkechauge Indian Nation. Michael L. Roy (Marsha K. Schmidt, on the brief), Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant St. Regis Mohawk Tribe. Michael R. Smith (R. Miles Clark, Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP; Peter D. Carmen, Meghan Murphy Beakman, Oneida Nation Legal Department, Verona, NY; Daniel F. Katz, Dennis M. Black, Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington D.C., on the brief), Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee Oneida Nation of New York.
For defendant: Andrew D. Bing (Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Alison J. Nathan, Special Counsel to the Solicitor General, Steven C. Wu, Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief), Deputy Solicitor General, for Defendants-Appellants Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas H. Mattox, Richard Ernst, and Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee John Melville. Michael T. Feeley (Lisa A. Coppola, on the brief), Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola LLC, Buffalo, NY, for Amicus Curiae Akwesasne Convenience Store Association. Michael A. Cardozo (Eric Proshansky, Aaron M. Bloom, William H. Miller, on the brief), Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae the City of New York. Richard T. Sullivan, Harris Beach PLLC, Buffalo, NY, for Amicus Curiae New York Association of Convenience Stores. Thomas G. Jackson (Meagan A. Zapotocky, on the brief), Phillips Nizer, LLP, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae New York State Association of Tobacco and Candy Distributors, Inc.*
Case number: 10-4265(L)

Cite as: Oneida Nation of New York v. Cuomo, 10-4265(L), NYLJ 1202493468026, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 9, 2011)Before: Wesley, Chin, and Lohier, C.JJ.p c

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources