Search Results

0 results for 'Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
David Smalley And Judith Smalley, V. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Publication Date: 2014-03-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT
Judge: J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers, And Whalen, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 13-01632

Laduca Law Firm, LLP, Rochester (Anthony J. Laduca Of Counsel), For Plaintiffs-Appellants.Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Lars E. Gulbrandsen, Of The Wisconsin Bar, Admi

March 06, 2014 |

Asia Deal Digest: March 6, 2014

* Sullivan & Cromwell and Mori Hamada team for Japan Display's $3.8 billion Tokyo IPO* Clifford Chance advises Chinese state food giant COFCO on its acquisition of a Dutch grain trader* Skadden on planned $500 million IPO for Chinese microblogging service Sina Weibo
9 minute read
November 19, 2013 |

In re Appeal of Harley-Davidson Motor, PICS Case No. 13-3084 (Pa. Commw. Oct. 30, 2013) Covey, J.; Pellegrini, J., dissenting (31 pages).

Property Tax Assessment • Environmental Impact • Cost-to-Cure Approach • Fair Market Value
4 minute read
JANICE JONES, ETC. res, v. LEFRANCE LEASING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def, ALLIANCE ELEVATOR COMPANY, ap
Publication Date: 2013-11-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Judge: Mastro, J.P.; Leventhal, Lott and Roman, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

JANICE JONES, ETC. res, v. LEFRANCE LEASING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def, ALLIANCE ELEVATOR COMPANY, ap — (INDEX NO. 17558/07) In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death

Smith v. CSX Transp. Inc.
Publication Date: 2010-11-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, John J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael J. Warshauer, Douglas C. Dumont Warshauer Law Group PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: James E. Gilson, Karen R. Dunbar Casey Gilson PC, Atlanta, for Appellee.
Case number: A10A1289

The trial court erred in refusing to give the plaintiff's requested jury charge based on 29 CFR § 1910.24, the OSHA r ion requiring certain tread on fixed general industrial stairs, since that

Boyce v. Gregory Poole Equipment Co.
Publication Date: 2004-10-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Trent B. Speckhals, Hector R. Cora Speckhals & Cora PC, and William P. Evans Dietrick, Evans, Scholz & Williams, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: . Thomas G. Tidwell Kasowitz, Benson, Tores & Friedman LLP, and Carolyn A. Wilson Richter, Head, Shinall & Whige, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: A04A2020; A04A2251

Material issues of fact remained as to the distributor's failure to advise the purchaser in 1994 of the availability of a safety device for a standup forklift and its failure to warn of the inherent

Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. v. Crosby
Publication Date: 2001-03-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Sears, Leah Ward
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: W. Wray Eckl, Melanie C. Eyre Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Atlanta, and Dawn G. Benson Watson, Spence, Lowe & Chambless LLP, for appellant.
For defendant: Edward E. Strain III, David A. Sleppy Cathey & Strain, Cornelia, Sidney L. Cottingham and Robert L. Porter Jr. Cottingham & Porter, Douglas, for appellees. Amicus appellants: Byron Attridge, Chilton D. Varner, Amy M. Power King & Spaulding, Douglas N. Campbell, Kenneth J. Moran McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, N. Karen Deming, Carmie L. McCurry Troutman Sanders, Terry R. Howell Lord, Bissell & Brook, G. Michael Banick, Karen M. Raby Alembik, Fine & Callner PA, Atlanta, High F. Young Jr., Reston, Va., and Harvey M. Grossman, Los Angeles, Calif. Amicus appellees: Deborah A. Ausburn Lord, Bissell & Brook, George W. Fryhofer III, Terrance C. Sullivan, Cale H. Conley Butler, Wooten, Overby, Fryhofer & Daugherty, Atlanta, James E. Butler Jr. and Joel O. Wooten Jr. Conley Butler, Wooten, Overby, Fryhofer & Daugherty, Columbus.
Case number: S00G0490

The tire manufacturer's adjustment statistics based on honored consumer claims were inadmissible in the plaintiff's product liability suit because there was no substantial similarity between the tir

Mills v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.
Publication Date: 2000-03-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A99A2324, A99A2325

Since federal regulations require the same warnings from all railroad crossing automatic warning devices, evidence that some of railroad's devices previously gave delayed warnings was admissible in

Mills v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.
Publication Date: 2000-01-21
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A99A2324, A99A2325

Since federal regulations require the same warnings from all railroad crossing automatic warning devices, evidence that some of railroad's devices previously gave delayed warnings was admissible in

H-D Michigan, LLC et al v. Hellenic Duty Freeshopss.A
Publication Date: 2012-09-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 7th Cir.
Judge: Hamilton, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 11-3618, 11-3838,, 12-1280

ARGUED MAY 24, 2012Before CUDAHY, KANNE, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.These consolidated appeals arise from an international trademark licensing dispute between plaintiff Harley-Davidson M

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now