Search Results

0 results for 'Hallett & Perrin'

You can use to get even better search results
March 01, 2007 |

Tender Offer Closes Health-Food Deal Fast

Skadden attorneys say they felt guilty about late-night pizza when working on a $700 million marriage between Whole Foods and another health-food retailer.
3 minute read
August 30, 2004 |

Paper Seeks Summary Judgment in Suit Over HIV-Status Disclosure

The Dallas Observer, its parent company and others have been targeted in a $1.1 billion suit by a plaintiff who alleges the alternative weekly wrongfully disclosed his HIV-positive status, referencing him by name in a published article last December.
7 minute read
April 25, 2005 |

Inadmissible

6 minute read
October 26, 2009 |

No Right in ERISA to Eye Divorces

An Oct. 19 ruling by a U.S. district court judge in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) case demonstrates that retirement plan administrators are in a bad spot when confronted with beneficiaries who they suspect of gaming the system to access retirement payments, several experts say. Steven Mitby, representing one side in the suit, applauded the ruling.
7 minute read
July 30, 2009 |

Home Restoration Client May Be Money Pit for Law Firms

At least four law firms have been left hanging for millions of dollars in legal fees from a home restoration company whose former chairman pleaded guilty to fraud involving another corporation.
5 minute read
June 17, 2008 |

VerdictSearch: Male Bartenders Recover $1 Million in Gender Discrimination Case

The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission has accepted $1 million to settle a suit against a Cajun-style restaurant chain that allegedly gave preference to women for bartending jobs. The defendant restaurant chain denied having a policy setting a male-female bartender ratio, contending that its staffing decisions were based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons.
1 minute read
September 02, 2004 |

Billion-Dollar HIV Suit Raises First Amendment Issues

The Dallas Observer, its parent company New Times Inc. and others have been targeted in a $1.1 billion suit by a plaintiff who alleges the alternative weekly wrongfully disclosed his HIV-positive status, referencing him by name in a published article. Three of the defendants are seeking the dismissal of the plaintiff's petition, which First Amendment lawyers say raises significant constitutional questions never before ruled on by a state judge in Texas.
7 minute read
December 09, 2002 |

Verdicts & Settlements

5 minute read
December 09, 2002 |

Verdicts and Settlements

5 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now