0 results for 'Gross Mcginley'
3rd Circuit Hands Victory to Employment Bias Plaintiffs
In a significant victory for employment discrimination plaintiffs, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the federal caps on damages should be applied in a way that maximizes a verdict-winning plaintiff's recovery by assigning as much of the jury's award as possible to claims brought under state statute with no caps.No Private Right to Sue Over Unwanted Mail
Under federal law, anyone who receives unordered merchandise in the mail has the right to treat it as a gift, but a divided federal appeals court has now ruled that the law does not create a private right of action for individuals to sue when they claim they were duped into paying for unordered goods.3rd Circuit Finds No Private Right to Sue Over Unwanted Mail
Under federal law, anyone who receives unordered merchandise in the mail has the right to treat it "as a gift," but a divided federal appeals court has now ruled that the law does not create a private right of action for individuals to sue when they claim they were duped into paying for unordered goods. The 3rd Circuit upheld the dismissal of a class action suit, finding that §3009 of the Postal Reorganization Act provides only for enforcement by the FTC.Jury Clears Hospital in Case Alleging Untimely Diagnosis
A Montgomery County jury has cleared a doctor and a local hospital of allegations that they failed to diagnose a patient with a rare sickness in a timely manner.Federal Law Can Step In to Replace Claims For Punitives Under PHRA, Judge Rules
Now that punitive damages are no longer allowed under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, defense lawyers are asking judges to strike the requests for punitives from pending lawsuits where the original demand for punitives was made only under the PHRA count. But in the first ruling on that issue, U.S. District Judge John R. Padova held that in such a case, courts should construe the claim for punitives to be brought under both state and federal law and allow it to proceed whenever federal law allows.In 'Pension Committee,' Judge Revisits 'Zubulake'
H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, write that the most vexing issues facing lawyers and clients today may be those accompanying efforts to institute and maintain a defensible legal hold and avoid a detour from the merits of litigation into a sanctions proceeding and endless "discovery about discovery."State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now