0 results for 'Google International LLC'
First-of-Its-Kind Ruling is a Win for Texas Construction Contractors
This is the first case squarely about Chapter 114, the legislative waiver of immunity for state construction contracts. - Associated Builders and Contractors of Texas amicus curiae'Bullied, Deceived and Pressured': Condo Owners Sue Biscayne 21, TRD Biscayne
"This case could be a cautionary tale for all other prospective developers that really need to look at the documents to see whether they are permitted to do what they are trying to do," Glen H. Waldman, a partner at Armstrong Teasdale, alleged in an interview.Employee Sues Delta, Claiming Wrongful Firing Due to His Race
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.Agro Research, Sentinel Biologics, Amazon Hit With Lawsuit over 'Natural' and 'Organic' Fertilizer
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.Morgan & Morgan Enters the Mileage Fray, Setting Its Sights on Papa Johns
The suit alleges a Papa Johns franchisee violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by under-reimbursing delivery drivers for their mileage.View more book results for the query "Google International LLC"
Antitrust Class Action Alleges Fragrance Industry Price-Fixing
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the document here.A Whole Mess of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners up this week include litigators at Freshfields, Hanson Bridgett, Kirkland and Winston & Strawn.Another Round of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Litigators at Baker Botts knocked out a nine-digit verdict against DISH Network in a patent showdown with ClearPlay Inc.'Punch Them in the Face and See What Happens': Strategy Behind Carnival's $21M Verdict
"Our job was showing that they had misused information and disclosed confidential information at the same time," said Steve Routh, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.Connecticut Jury Returns $20 Million Verdict in Landmark Asbestos Case
"Like many reckless corporate actors before them, they were confronted with a regulation that they didn't want to comply with, which was the 1972 OSHA Asbestos Regulation," counsel for the plaintiffs, Sam Iola, said. "Instead of trying to comply with it and put warnings on their products, they decided they were going to lie about it, and deny the very idea that there was asbestos in this product to begin with."