Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Gibbons'

You can use to get even better search results
Getlin v. Zoll, 08-1872
Publication Date: 2010-04-28
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
Judge: Denis Hurley
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08-1872

District Judge Denis R. Hurley U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff: By: Alan D. Levine, Esq., Law Offices of Alan D. Levin

Zillas v. City of New York, 23256/99
Publication Date: 2007-04-12
Practice Area: Government
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
Judge: Jack Battaglia
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23256/99

Justice Jack M. Battaglia KINGS COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiff was represented by Francesco Pomara, Jr., Esq. of Mallilo & Grossman, Esqs. Defendants Budg

Aksamit v. 772 Park Avenue Corp
Publication Date: 2003-10-22
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Stanislaw Akasmit ("Plaintiff") sued his former employers, 772 Park Avenue Corporation and Brown Harris Stevens, LLC, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§623(a)(1)

April 04, 2007 |

Rowe v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al

In this products liability, failure-to-warn case, Michigan's interest in applying its law outweighs New Jersey's interest in deterring the manufacture of unsafe products within its borders.
5 minute read
June 28, 2007 |

Insurer to Pay $20 Million in Bad Faith Case Over Dram Shop Suit

In the largest settlement to date in a Pennsylvania insurance bad faith case, the Princeton Insurance Co. has agreed to pay $20 million to settle a claim brought on behalf of a tavern that was hit with a $75 million verdict in a Dram Shop Act suit after the insurer refused to settle the case for the tavern's policy limit of $1 million. The tavern had assigned its rights to pursue the bad faith claim to Joseph Tuski, a former highway worker who was left quadriplegic after he was struck by a drunken driver.
5 minute read
June 22, 2006 |

Pa. Federal Judge: Discovery Limits Sink Arbitration Clause

An arbitration clause is "subjectively unconscionable," and therefore unenforceable, if it puts a plaintiff at a "distinct disadvantage" by restricting discovery depositions to expert witnesses, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled. The judge refused to compel arbitration in a personal injury suit against an assisted-living center, concluding that to do so would unfairly prohibit the plaintiff from taking depositions of key fact witnesses, denying her a "fair opportunity to present her claims."
5 minute read
United States v. Gregory Gilmore, 04 CR 1073
Publication Date: 2007-01-26
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
Judge: I. Glasser
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 04 CR 1073

Glasser, United States District Judge U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Casey Peter Kirschheimer, Federal Defenders

April 06, 2010 |

Trying to Avoid an At-Risk Launch in Hatch-Waxman Cases? New Jersey's Local Patent Rules Make It an Attractive Venue

The District of New Jersey's local patent rules and sophisticated bench make it an attractive venue for brand pharmaceutical companies seeking to avoid generic at-risk launches.
6 minute read
Computer Management Assistance Co. v. Robert F. Decastro Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-07-27
Practice Area: copyrights
Industry:
Court: 5th Cir.
Judge: GARWOOD, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. 99-30513

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:Plaintiff-Appellant appeals the district court's entry of judgment for Defendant-A

July 09, 2004 |

As Same-Sex Couples Go Legal, Questions Swirl

With New Jersey's Domestic Partnership Act set to take effect Saturday, lawyers are grappling with loose ends, checking for loopholes and flocking to seminars to figure out just what the law does, and does not do. At first glance, the act -- which makes New Jersey the fifth state to recognize some form of same-sex union -- seems simple enough. But while the law creates a status akin to marriage, its benefits fall short, causing a shortage of clear-cut legal answers.
7 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now