0 results for 'Geico'
Pa. Supreme Court Completes U-Turn on Validity of Household Exclusion
Back in 2019, in the case of Gallagher v. GEICO Indemnity, 201 A.3d 131, 138 (Pa. 2019), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the household exclusion, found in automobile insurance policies, violated Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and was, therefore, not enforceable under any circumstance.1 Million Reasons to Listen to this Miami Lawyer's Deposition Strategy: 7-Figure Settlement
"We got him to admit almost all of the facts needed to prove our case" said Justin Shapiro, a Miami trial attorney.Insurer's High Court Win Could Defang Legislative Push to End Stacking
"Mione shows you don't even need the legislation because the courts are interpreting stacking consistently," said Scott Cooper of Schmidt Kramer.'So Hostile and Unpleasant': Lawsuit Claims to Reveal How John Ruiz Acquired LifeWallet
John H. Ruiz allegedly told the LifeWallet founder to consider the deal binding as a "gentleman's agreement," because the asset purchase agreement could not yet be signed due to the public offering, according to the lawsuit.Pa. Supreme Court Decisions and Rule Changes Continue to Favor Plaintiff's Causes
With the pendulum of judicial thought at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court level having swung so far in the plaintiffs favor, it appears that the sky's the limit for the plaintiffs bar to continue to alter the legal landscape in Pennsylvania.View more book results for the query "Geico"
Geico Gets A Chance to Defend Itself in STD Case
The case is being sent back down to lower courts for deliberation after the Missouri Supreme Court found that Geico should have a chance to defend itself against the claims.Employee Sues GEICO for Alleged Age Discrimination
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.2022 Year-End Review: Use of Zoom Becomes the Norm, Several Law Changes
Here's a look at the notable trends and decisions in Pennsylvania civil litigation law over the past year along with a review of anticipated decisions to keep an eye out for in the year ahead.What Happens When Precedent Splinters? A Look at 'Gustafson'
A recent en banc Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, Gustafson v. Springfield, 282 A.3d 739, (Pa. Super. 2022), produced a sufficiently splintered set of opinions that the end result—a reversal of the trial court's order sustaining preliminary objections—was contrary to the result that would have prevailed by counting judicial noses.Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now