Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Geico'

You can use to get even better search results
October 23, 2012 |

Adamitis v. Erie Insurance Exchange, PICS Case No. 12-1833 (Pa. Super. Sept. 25, 2012) Stevens, P.J. (15 pages).

The regular use exclusion applied in this case to prohibit underinsured motorist coverage; it was not against public policy or ambiguous and appellant was provided proper notice of the amendment adding the exclusion to his policy. Denial of coverage affirmed.
3 minute read
November 13, 2009 |

Suits & Deals

Large settlements and verdicts in New Jersey
4 minute read
August 22, 2002 |

Suit in Miami Takes On Metabolife

Now that the Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation of San Diego-based Metabolife International, the largest manufacturer of the diet product ephedra, the lawsuits have started. Miami attorney John H. Ruiz has filed what he says is the first class action against Metabolife in Florida, following suits previously filed in Alabama and California. The FDA warns that ephedra can cause numerous health problems.
3 minute read
September 19, 2012 |

After 'Viral' Progressive Case, State Should Rethink Bad Faith Insurance Laws

By now, millions of people have read Matt Fisher's blog posting entitled "My Sister Paid Progressive Insurance to Defend Her Killer in Court."
6 minute read
April 08, 2010 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 19, No. 67 - April 8 2010

Daily decision alert.
10 minute read
November 01, 2006 |

Raffellini, respondent v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., appellant

Insurer Cannot Raise Affirmative Defense Alleging Insured�s Failure to Sustain �5102(d) �Serious Injury�
22 minute read
February 22, 2011 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 20, No. 34 - Feb. 22, 2011

Daily decision alert.
14 minute read
April 08, 2010 |

No-Fault Insurance Wrap-Up

David M. Barshay, a partner at Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, and David M. Gottlieb, an associate with the firm, review recent decisions of interest, including the Appellate Term's rejection of an argument that plaintiff had no standing to maintain its action because the assignment was signed by a minor and was therefore defective, and a finding that although the defendant and the lower court referred to a motion as a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the Appellate Term determined that the motion was actually a motion for summary judgment, and that the lower court properly treated it as one.
10 minute read
January 08, 2010 |

Insurance Fraud

Evan H. Krinick and Barry I. Levy, partners with Rivkin Radler, write that almost five years ago, the Court of Appeals issued its watershed decision in State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mallela. Since then, the ruling has been cited in more than 100 other opinions and has provided great support for insurance company efforts to reduce fraudulent no fault claims. Because of its great practical significance, however, both medical providers and insurance companies continue to litigate numerous issues left open by Mallela, and although none of these has yet reached the New York Court of Appeals, there is a great deal of appellate authority on a variety of these subjects.
10 minute read
June 01, 2009 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 18, No. 104 - June 1, 2009

Daily decision alert.
11 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now