Search Results

0 results for 'GEICO Indemnity Company'

You can use to get even better search results
March 30, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Supreme Court Completes U-Turn on Validity of Household Exclusion

Back in 2019, in the case of Gallagher v. GEICO Indemnity, 201 A.3d 131, 138 (Pa. 2019), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the household exclusion, found in automobile insurance policies, violated Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and was, therefore, not enforceable under any circumstance.
13 minute read
Brooks v. GEICO Ins. Agency Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-02-28
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Civil Court, Queens
Judge: Judge Patria Frias-Colon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CV-000426-22/QU

Plaintiff's Claim for Fraudulent and Excessive Charges Against GEICO Lack Legal Merit

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 24, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-02-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:February 22, 2023

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 22, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-02-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:February 17, 2023

February 16, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Insurer's High Court Win Could Defang Legislative Push to End Stacking

"Mione shows you don't even need the legislation because the courts are interpreting stacking consistently," said Scott Cooper of Schmidt Kramer.
3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Representing High-Tech Companies Authors: Gary M. Lawrence, Carl Baranowski View this Book

View more book results for the query "GEICO Indemnity Company"

Am. Transit Ins. Co. v. Right Choice Supply Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-02-15
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Supreme Court, Kings
Judge: Justice Aaron D. Maslow
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Petitioner: David Fair of counsel, Larkin Farrell LLC.
For defendant:
Case number: 532234/2022

No-Fault Insurance Arbitrator Need Not Apply Case Law On Expert Witness Conclusions

Gov't Emp. Ins. Co. v. Kalitenko
Publication Date: 2023-01-12
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Health Care | Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-CV-3804

Insurer's Bid Compel Interrogatory Responses, Documents in Fraud Action Partly Granted

Appellate Division, Second Department: December 9, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-12-09
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:December 7, 2022

November 17, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer

What Happens When Precedent Splinters? A Look at 'Gustafson'

A recent en banc Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, Gustafson v. Springfield, 282 A.3d 739, (Pa. Super. 2022), produced a sufficiently splintered set of opinions that the end result—a reversal of the trial court's order sustaining preliminary objections—was contrary to the result that would have prevailed by counting judicial noses.
9 minute read
Owens v. Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Publication Date: 2022-09-30
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation | Personal Injury
Industry: Insurance
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Douglas Herman, (The Hostilo Law Firm), Savannah, for appellant.
For defendant: Thomas Bass, (Brennan, Harris & Rominger), Savannah, for appellee; Travis Meyer, Morgan Allyn, (Waldon Adelman Castilla Hiestand & Prout), Atlanta, for other party.
Case number: A22A0694

Court affirms summary judgment for an insurer that denied coverage in an auto accident case because insured party's late notice was unjustified and unreasonable

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now