0 results for 'Forry Ullman'
Philadelphia Jury Sides With Plaintiff In UM Case
Following a two-day trial and less than two hours of deliberation, an eight-member jury awarded $250,000 to a man who was injured in a car accident while driving a vehicle insured under an uninsured motorist policy through Progressive Advanced Insurance Co.Phila. Jury Sides With Driver Injured In Van Crash
On Oct. 14, 2010, plaintiff Vincent Casino Jr., 44, was operating a van toward the intersection of N. 12th Street and W. Allegheny Avenue, in the Glenwood section of North Philadelphia, when the passenger's side of his vehicle was struck by the front of a sedan.Phila. Jury Awards $133,000 for Rear-End Collision
According to court documents, plaintiff Gary Murray, 57, was rear-ended while driving along 7 Oaks Drive at its intersection with Cheltenham Avenue in Philadelphia. Murray claimed that the accident caused soft-tissue injuries of the back, neck and shoulder.Herd Chiropractic Clinic, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Herd Chiropractic Clinic, P.C.v.State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 64 A.3d 1058Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.HERD…Two-Month Delay Doesn't Spell Bad Faith
Just because it took an insurance company two months to settle a claim doesn't mean the company acted in bad faith, because its investigation revealed several "red flags" that required investigation, a common pleas court judge has ruled.Plaintiffs' Discovery Requests Were 'Punishment,'
Saying he suspected that a plaintiff's discovery requests were "designed to inflict punishment upon the defendants, rather than to obtain useful information," a federal judge has strictly limited the scope of discovery in an insurance bad faith case.Peer Review Doesn't Preclude Attorney Fee Awards Against Insurers
A trial court can order an automobile insurer to pay a medical provider's attorney fees even if the insurer properly employed the peer review process before denying coverage because it deemed the medical care unnecessary.Insurer Must Cover Sump Pump Overflow, Despite Exclusion
An insurer must cover water damage caused by a sump pump backup, even though an exclusion in the policy seems to preclude coverage for such damages, a Superior Court panel has ruled.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now