0 results for 'Ford Motor Co'
Court: Mention of Excluded Causation Theory Requires New Trial
Defense counsel's references to a theory of causation that had been excluded pretrial were prejudicial to the plaintiffs, a divided state Superior Court panel ruled, granting a new trial in a medical negligence case.Court: Mention of Excluded Causation Theory Requires New Trial
Defense counsel's references to a theory of causation that had been excluded pretrial were prejudicial to the plaintiffs, a divided state Superior Court panel ruled, granting a new trial in a medical negligence case.Use of Social Media Against Personal Injury Defendants
Theodore W. Ucinski III and Jamie R. Prisco examine the recent trend in New York of restaurants', retail stores', or malls' social media posts or websites being used against them by injured plaintiffs, and provide some general recommendations as to how defense counsel and their clients should treat social media while involved in such litigation.Ten Tips on Defending a DWI Blood Case
Defending a DWI blood case is not impossible; there are a number of viable arguments that can be pursued to achieve a successful result.Pa. Supreme Court Denies Appeal in Ford Roll-Over Case
The state Supreme Court has declined to hear a case against Ford Motor Co. that involved a controversial theory of injury in roll-over accidents.Ruling on Asbestos Experts a Potential Game Changer
In his Complex Litigation column, Michael Hoenig discusses asbestos litigation and the single-fiber theory, and a bombshell ruling that exposes the tensions between what experts claimed and what New York's legal standards require in order to admit reliable expert testimony.Asbestos 'Any Exposure' Arguments Delve Into Causation
The crossroads of medical and legal causation of mesothelioma was on display before the state Supreme Court on Wednesday in a case set to determine whether a plaintiff's expert testimony was based on an impermissible "any exposure" theory of causation.Business Groups Say NJ Too Soft on Expert Witnesses
Business interests and lawyers who represent them are urging that New Jersey discard its 22-year-old rule governing the admission of expert testimony and replace it with the more stringent federal standard.Defendants Lack Cause for Additional PTSD Testing
The plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident will not need to undergo additional medical testing that the defendants' expert claimed is necessary to render a more accurate examination of the plaintiff's claimed post-traumatic stress disorder, a Lackawanna County judge has ruled.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now