0 results for 'FMR LLC'
Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7056 AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. A
Supreme Court on Severance, Affirmative Action, SOX, FLSA
In their Labor Relations column, John P. Furfaro and Risa M. Salins address the court's rulings in cases involving rights of a state's citizens to repeal affirmative action policies, the scope of the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the meaning of donning and doffing clothes under the Fair Labor Standards Act and whether severance pay is subject to withholding taxes.How Wide the Floodgates for Whistleblowers?
Until unanswered questions are resolved, private and public employers alike could face a broad variety of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claims.Judge OKs Whistleblower Suit Against Nonpublic Company
In the first federal ruling to examine the scope of an agency relationship between a publicly traded company and a non-publicly traded company necessary to trigger coverage under the whistleblower protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, an Eastern District of Pennsylvania judge has allowed a former employee of the non-publicly traded subsidiary of a public company to proceed with his whistleblower suit.Crackdown: Why Corporate Counsel Should Care About the Department of Labor
The new regulations covering disabled workers require covered federal contractors to set a hiring goal of 7 percent disabled workers in each job group.Whistleblower Rules Extend to Private Companies
U.S. Supreme Court decision broadens reach of Sarbanes-Oxley beyond publicly held corporations.In Practice: Whistleblower Rights Expand With Supreme Court Ruling
6-3 decision on reach of Sarbanes-Oxley extends protections to employees of contractors and subcontractors of publicly traded companies, explains Jared Kopel.Extended Whistleblower Protections Create More Liability for Companies
J. Gregory Lahr and Ryan C. Chapoteau, partners at Sedgwick, discuss the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court recently expanding the whistleblower anti-retaliation protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to include employees of privately held contractors who perform work for public companies.Dan Krisch: Shocked, Outraged And Amused Agreement
I am thinking in two places at once this week. Like many members of the bar, I am outraged that the U.S. Senate refused to confirm Debo Adegbile as head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division because he committed the grievous sin of representing an unpopular client. At the same time, I find myself amused by (and, shockingly, agreeing with!) Justice Antonin Scalia's concurrence in Lawson v. FMR LLC—a pithy shot across the bow of that tired and overloaded vessel, the S.S. Legislative History.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now