Case transferred where most of the events giving rise to the action occurred in another district and plaintiff had filed suit outside the district where she lived. Defendants' motion to transfer venue granted.

Plaintiff moved for remand after her pelvic mesh tort action was removed to federal court and court found Pennsylvania's supplier's joinder was fraudulent, since that defendant had been found immune under the Biomaterials Access Assurance Act years earlier, and court had jurisdiction over the case but that transfer to Florida was warranted. Motion denied, motion granted.

Expert's Testimony Partly Excluded in Pelvic Mesh Products Injury Action

Plaintiff moved to remand her pelvic mesh device action to state court and court found that a Pennsylvania defendant that was dismissed from plaintiff's original complaint under the Biomedical Access Assurance Act was improperly joined and there was no bar to defendant's removal of the case. Motion denied.

Plaintiffs moved to remand their pelvic mesh tort cases and court found plaintiffs did not have a colorable basis to sue the home state defendants because plaintiffs improperly joined a Pennsylvania company that had been dismissed from the litigation with prejudice five years earlier as immune under federal law and plaintiffs offered no new evidence or theories. Venue transferred.