Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Ethicon, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
People v. Johnson & Johnson
Publication Date: 2022-04-18
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Health Care
Court: Court of Appeal, 4th District
Judge: Presiding Justice McConnell
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D077945

Medical products manufacturers' marketing communications properly deemed to be misleading to medical professionals

April 06, 2022 | New Jersey Law Journal

Products Litigation Targets Hernia Mesh

This suit was surfaced on Law.com Radar. Read the document here.
1 minute read
Paesano v. Ethicon Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-04-01
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Cathy Seibel
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Thomas G. Cascione, Cascione Purcigliotti & Galluzzi, P.C., Eastchester, New York.
For defendant: Counsel for Defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson: Maha M. Kabbash, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP, Morristown, New Jersey.
Case number: 19-CV-10979

Personal Injury Claims Over Pelvic Mesh Products Dismissed as Time-Barred

March 18, 2022 | Texas Lawyer

Banking & Financial Services Drops 32 Percent on List of Federal Litigation Trends by Industry: What's Happening In Texas Litigation?

Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc. were slapped with a product liability lawsuit Thursday in Texas Southern District Court regarding the company's hernia mesh product.
1 minute read
December 28, 2021 | New Jersey Law Journal

What Will the New Year Bring? A Glimpse of What's Coming From the New Jersey Supreme Court in 2022

Former Supreme Court Justice Peter Verniero, now with Sills, Cummis & Gross in Newark, has a hand in two of the highest-profile cases before the court this year: he represents brokerage firm Max Spann as well as St. Theresa, a parochial school in Kenilworth.
8 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner View this Book

View more book results for the query "Ethicon, Inc."

Fortis Advisors LLC v. Johnson & Johnson
Publication Date: 2021-12-28
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Bradley R. Aronstam, Roger S. Stronach, Ross, Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Philippe Z. Selendy, Andrew R. Dunlap, Sean P. Baldwin, Joshua S. Margolin, Greg Wolfe, Vivek Tata, Selendy & Gay LLC, New York, NY; Martin S. Schenker, Jeffrey S. Karr, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA; Daniel J. Pohlman, Daniel P. Roy III, Cooley LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: William M. Lafferty, Susan W. Waesco, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht, & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gary A. Bornstein, Damaris Hernández, LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case number: D69655

The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims of common law fraud, breach of implied covenant of good faith, entitlement to recission based upon mutual mistake, and unjust enrichment.

December 20, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer

Looking Back on The Legal's Top Verdicts of 2021

Pandemic-related court closures meant the beginning of 2021 was rife with stalled litigation, but as courts brought back juries Pennsylvania's attorneys were able to secure some big-ticket verdicts in the second half of the year.
5 minute read
Edge Sys. LLC v. Cartessa Aesthetics LLC
Publication Date: 2021-12-08
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Gary Brown
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Sean Michael Murray, Knobbe Martens, Irvine, CA.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendant: Steven P. Tepera, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Austin, TX. Attorney for Defendant: David George Keyko, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 20-CV-6082

Court Rules on Construction Claims, Rejects Dismissal of Unclean Hands Defense

October 25, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer

Medical Device Litigation—Is the End Near for Comment K?

Comment k was intended to be a narrow exception to strict liability and only applied in cases where an otherwise useful product is "incapable of being made safe."
13 minute read
Ethicon, Inc. v. Randall
Publication Date: 2021-09-14
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Martinotti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2:20-cv-13524 (BRM) (JBC)

Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to hold defendant in contempt.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now