Search Results

0 results for 'Environmental Protection Agency'

You can use to get even better search results
Bellin v. Zucker
Publication Date: 2024-02-20
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19 Civ. 5694

Medicaid Recipient Lacked Property Right for In-Home Care Before Enrolling Into Facility

February 16, 2024 | Daily Business Review

As South Florida Runs Low on Land to Develop, Some Law Firms Are Looking North for Growth

As South Florida's boom is generating issues with affordability and limited space for construction, some law firms are starting to invest in other regions within the state with abundant land as well as access to water.
5 minute read
February 16, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Climate Change–Related Disclosures and Disinvestment: Where Are We Now?

In their Domestic Environmental Law column, Christopher Rizzo and Karen Meara present the current state of the law for climate disclosures in select major markets, particularly New York, and likely developments in 2024.
8 minute read
Revitalize Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust v. National Grid USA
Publication Date: 2024-02-15
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Beth Robinson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Laura E. Jensen, on the brief, Jeffrey D. Talbert, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, LLP, Portland, ME. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Alan J. Knauf, Linda R. Shaw, Amy K. Kendall, Jonathan R. Tantillo, Knauf Shaw LLP, Rochester, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation: Steven T. Miano, Peter V. Keays, on the brief, Robert A. Wiygul, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA. For Defendant-Appellee General Electric Company: Dean S. Sommer, Kristin Carter Rowe, Young/Sommer LLC, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Northeast Management Services, Inc.: Douglas H. Zamelis, The Law Office of Douglas H. Zamelis, Cooperstown, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC and Hauler's Facility LLC: Gregory M. Brown, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees National Grid USA and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation: Yvonne E. Hennessey, Barclay Damon LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Verizon New York Inc. as successor to Telesector Resources Group, Inc.: Philip H. Gitlen, Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Honeywell International Inc.: Geoffrey Michael, Lauren C. Daniel, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, and Syracuse LePage LLC: Michael A. Fogel, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, Syracuse LePage LLC, Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC, Hauler's Facility LLC: Patrick D. Donnelly, McGivney, Kluger Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Amparit Industries, LLC: Lori E. Petrone, Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak, LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee B&B Family Limited Partnership: Joseph R. Talarico, II, Talarico Law Firm, Fayetteville, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Jagar Enterprises, Inc.: Linda E. Alario, Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Magna Powertrain USA, Inc., and New Process Gear, Inc.: John J. Kuster, Sidney Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Onondaga Pottery Company, Inc.: Andrew C. Rose, Nixon Peabody LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Metalico New York, Inc. and Metalico Syracuse Realty, Inc.: Albert J. Millus, Jr., Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton, NY. For Defendants-Appellees C&S Engineers, Inc. and Calocerinos and Spina: Paul D. Sylvestri, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Rochester NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Corporation, Carlyle Air Conditioning Company Inc., and Raytheon Technologies Corporation f/k/a United Technologies Corporation: Elizabeth C. Barton, Erick M. Sandler, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT. For Defendant-Appellee Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Glen R. Stuart, Adina D. Bingham, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, and Bernard J. Garbutt, III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Nokia of America Corporation and Western Electric Company, Incorporated: Meaghan G. Boyd, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, and David Venderbush, Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Gardner Denver, Inc.: Daniel T. Flaherty, Daniel C.W. Narvey, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee
Case number: 22-1589-cv

Consent Decree Resolved Only RACER's CERCLA Liability as to Plant, Pollutants Therefrom

February 14, 2024 | New York Law Journal

'Appellate Advocates': Application of Attorney-Client Privilege to Government Communications and More

A unanimous decision from the Court of Appeals forcefully emphasized that in legal matters, either in response to a FOIL request or in civil litigation, a governmental entity and its counsel are entitled to engage in confidential communications with counsel to discuss, establish and maintain its legal position, protected by the privilege. Due to the significance of the case, this article discusses the court's decision and the takeaways from it.
11 minute read
February 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal

The Environmental Rights Amendment's Standard of Review

What is the constitutional 'standard of review' the courts should use to judge a government action that allegedly violates the Green Amendment? The standard of review will decide its long-term importance.
11 minute read
SaveRGV v. Texas Gen. Land Office
Publication Date: 2024-02-12
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Constitutional Law | Environmental Law
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Silva
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 13-22-00358-CV

The Texas Constitution gives the public an unrestricted right to use, ingress and egress from public beaches in its Open Beaches Amendment, art. I, §33(b).

Stone v. Dobbs
Publication Date: 2024-02-12
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Real Estate | Regulation
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Stamford/Norwalk J.D. at Stamford
Judge: Judge Krumeich
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CV-23-6059542

Court Denies Motion to Strike for Exclusivity of Remedies

February 09, 2024 | Daily Business Review

Not Enough of a Good Thing: How Lack of Wetland Mitigation Credits Impacts Land Development in Fla.

Wetland impacts from land development in Florida are regulated via state and federal environmental permitting programs. To permit unavoidable wetland impacts, the regulatory agencies require lost wetland functions to be made up or mitigated by creating or enhancing wetlands somewhere else.
7 minute read
February 08, 2024 | National Law Journal

EPA Sets New Stringent Standards on Soot, Gaining Enviros' Praise, Big Oil's Scorn

EarthJustice calls the move "lifesaving" while the American Petroleum Institute decries a "short-sighted policy."
3 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now