Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Eli Lilly'

You can use to get even better search results
May 12, 2010 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 19, No. 90 - May 12, 2010

Daily decision alert.
10 minute read
May 05, 2009 |

Court Gives Dominant Firms More Flexibility on Pricing

Ankur Kapoor, an attorney at Constantine Cannon, and Jeffrey I. Shinder, a partner of the firm, write that although certain aspects of the Second Circuit's 1945 decision in United States v. Aluminum Co. of America have been rightly critiqued on economic grounds, the case continues to be cited for its principles of monopolistic conduct and continues to be widely taught in law school. The Supreme Court's back-of-the-hand treatment of such an iconic precedent in the recent Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications Inc. is remarkable.
6 minute read
May 14, 1999 |

Losing Influence

For many years there's been a mantra guiding big Cal. law firms that have established lobbying practices in Sacramento: They will inevitably dominate lobbying in the state capital -- just as law firms do in Washington, D.C. -- because they offer superior technical and legal expertise in an increasingly complex regulatory world. But that dominance isn't evident in California. Indeed, some doubt it ever will be.
12 minute read
April 18, 2011 |

The 2012 APPELLATE HOT LIST

We asked our readers to nominate firms with at least one significant appellate win between May 2011 and May 2012 and that had an impressive track record overall. We supplemented the results with our own research to arrive at the list of 16 firms you'll find here.
1 minute read
Anonymous v. Muratore, XXXX/09 [Index No. Redacted by Court]
Publication Date: 2010-11-05
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County, Part 4
Judge: Justice Ute Wolff Lally
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Molod Spitz & DeSantis, PC, New York, NY
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Ackerman, Levine, Cullen, Brickman & Limmer, LLP, Great Neck, NY
Case number: XXXX/09 [Index No. Redacted by Court]

Cite as: Anonymous v. Muratore, XXXX/09, NYLJ 1202474434260, at *1 (Sup., NA, Decided October 27, 2010)Justice Ute Wolff LallyDecided: Oc

Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv
Publication Date: 2010-11-23
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen P. Younger, (Clay J. Pierce and A. Leah Vickers, on the brief) Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, NY; Gregory K. McGillivary, Woodley & McGillivary (on the brief), Washington, DC; Andrew Quinn, Quinn & Mellea, LLP (on the brief), White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellees.
For defendant: Karen M. Griffin (of counsel), Andrez Carberry, Francis F. Caputo (on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellants.
Case number: 08-1839-cv

Cite as: Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv, NYLJ 1202475224106, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 16, 2010)Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.p

And the Winner Is...Highlights of The American Lawyer's Litigation Department of the Year Results
Publication Date: 2012-01-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

After months of reading submissions, vetting, and interviews, The American Lawyer has announced the winners of the magazine's sixth biennial Litigation Department of the Year contest. Gibson Dunn cinched the top billing for the second time in a row, but plenty of additional firms and more than a half-dozen individual litigators shared in the spotlight.

Strasmich v. Liberty Helicopters, Inc., 112243/07
Publication Date: 2011-06-21
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 35
Judge: Justice Carol Edmead
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 112243/07

Cite as: Strasmich v. Liberty Helicopters, Inc., 112243/07, NYLJ 1202497881978, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided June 16, 2011)Justice Carol Edmeadp class="decided

October 14, 2003 |

Law Firms are Defendants in Patent Suit

The opponents in a patent fight have taken the unusual step of pulling each other's law firms into the litigation ring. Rockwell Automation Inc. sued Chicago-based Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro last year for allegedly filing "baseless, sham" patent infringement suits. On Friday, Niro, Scavone client Solaia Technology fired back, claiming Rockwell and two of it's law firms -- Howrey, Simon and Fish & Richardson -- had induced other companies not to license Solaia's patent in violation of antitrust laws.
2 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources