0 results for 'Dow'
3rd Circuit Won't Disturb $500 Chemical Exposure Award in Paulsboro Derailment Case
The Third Circuit on Wednesday found no abuse of discretion in rejection of the plaintiff's medical expert for failure to proffer a sufficiently reliable causation methodology under the standard set out in the U.S. Supreme Court's 1993 "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals" decision.Psychological Testing: Controversy and Consensus
In his column on Matrimonial Practice, Timothy M. Tippins explores the current controversy regarding the reliability of psychological testing in custody determinations.Pass Your Next Legal Quiz (Or 'How to Ace a Senate Confirmation Hearing')
In her Litigation 101 column, Shira Forman writes: How would you do if faced with the same legal pop quiz as Matthew Petersen? Review this primer on the litigation concepts that eluded one would-be jurist.Amid Push for 'Daubert' in NJ, Plaintiffs Lawyers See No Need for Change
While a host of parties is urging the New Jersey Supreme Court to adopt the "Daubert" standard for admissibility of expert testimony, some lawyers say a change is unnecessary.DC Shifts to 'Daubert' Rule for Expert Testimony
The D.C. Court of Appeals ruled this week that the District would follow the standard used in the federal court system, replacing a rule that dates back nearly a century.Circuit Orders Bridgegate Co-Conspirator List to Remain Sealed
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that a list of unindicted co-conspirators from the Bridgegate scandal is not subject to any public right of access. The decision reverses a U.S. district court judge's order calling for disclosure of the list based on a finding that it is a bill of particulars and therefore in the public domain.No Daubert, No Gatekeeper?: Missouri Mass Tort Verdicts Linked to Handling of Science Evidence
When a St. Louis courthouse was the venue where three juries issued substantial verdicts this year against Johnson & Johnson and Monsanto Co., it came as little surprise to the defense bar, which has long complained about the standards under which Missouri's courts admit scientific evidence.When Experts 'Cherry-Pick' Among Competing Studies
In his Complex Litigation column, Michael Hoenig discusses a recent First Circuit decision that tees up some critical tensions in toxic tort experts' methodologies. For example, experts can and do rely upon scientific and technical literature. But what if the articles relied upon are themselves partially or wholly unreliable? Or what if there is inconsistent technical literature? Does "cherry-picking" favorable articles sufficiently create a jury question, or does the problem of conflicting literature go to the heart of the threshold "reliability" question inherent in Daubert admissibility criteria?Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now