Search Results

0 results for 'Disney Enterprises, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
September 19, 2018 | Law.com

Inside Track: Right Click for Not Happy. Plus, Hacking in the Rain and In-House Movers

Welcome back. I'm Law.com reporter Dan Clark and this is the latest edition of your favorite newsletter Inside Track. This week, eyes have been…
6 minute read
Canosa v. Ziff
Publication Date: 2018-08-17
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Corporate Governance
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Paul Engelmayer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 18 Civ. 4115

Citing Bankruptcy Estate's Efficient Administration, Court Retains Weinstein Case

August 14, 2018 | Litigation Daily

Daily Dicta: Disney Rebuffed in Suit Against Birthday Party Performers

Disney and its lawyers from Arnold & Porter have been handed a setback in an ill-conceived suit targeting costumed children's birthday party entertainers.
7 minute read
June 19, 2018 | The Recorder

Canadian Producer Claims Disney/Pixar's 'Inside Out' Ripped Off His Student Film

Damon Pourshian, the Toronto-based creative director of the production company Deviate, has sued Pixar and Disney, claiming that their 2015 hit animated feature "Inside Out" infringed his copyrighted 2000 student film of the same name.
1 minute read
June 08, 2018 | Corporate Counsel

The Best of the Rest: Presenting Our 2018 Best Legal Department Runners-Up

Corporate Counsel recently handed out its Best Legal Department honors. But there were other companies and individuals that impressed us beyond just this year's awardees.
4 minute read
April 17, 2018 | Daily Report Online

Experts: Hackers, Insiders and Regulators Are Among Companies' Biggest Threats

In-house data privacy and other cybersecurity experts spoke during a panel discussion at the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association's Southeast Regional Conference in Atlanta last week.
4 minute read
October 13, 2017 | Corporate Counsel

In-House Counsel Hold Differing Views on Sex-Trafficking Bill

The legislation is "horrible and counterproductive," said one chief legal officer.
4 minute read
August 28, 2017 | The Recorder

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.

9th Cir.; 16-56843 The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the Family Movie Act of 2005 did not exempt from liability…
2 minute read
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-08-28
Practice Area:
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos T. Bea and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Leslie E. Kobayashi,*District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli Jr. (argued),Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, D.C.; Glenn D. Pomerantz, Kelly M. Klaus, Rosa Leda Ehler, and Allyson R. Bennettt, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees.
For defendant: Peter K. Stris (argued), Elizabeth Rogers Brannen, Dana Berkowitz, and Victor O'Connell, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, California; Brendan S. Maher, Daniel L. Geyser, and Douglas D. Geyser, Stris & Maher LLP, Dallas, Texas; Ryan Geoffrey Baker, Jaime Wayne Marquart, and Scott M. Malzahn, Baker Marquart LLP, Los Angeles, California; David W. Quinto, VidAngel Inc., Beverly Hills, California; Shaun P. Martin, University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California; for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.
Case number: No. 16-56843

Family Movie Act of 2005 did not exempt from liability for copyright infringement online streaming service that offered filtered versions of movies (Hurwitz, J.)

Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2017-08-28
Practice Area:
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom | Insurance | Entertainment and Leisure
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard C. Tallman and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Stephen Joseph Murphy, III,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kirk Pasich (argued), Pamela M. Woods, and Anamay M. Carmel, Liner LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Robert M. Traylor (argued), Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 15-55777

Claim under Telephone Consumer Protection Act is implicitly invasion of privacy claim (N.R. Smith, J.)

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now